Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29940995›Full record

ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2018

Prevalence of human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms.

Therese Råsbäck, Thomas Rosendal, Michael Stampe, Axel Sannö, Anna Aspán, Katarina Järnevi, Elina Tast Lahti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Update in Knowledge of Pigs as the Source of Zoonotic Pathogens.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Yersiniosis in New Zealand.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cross-border outbreak ofEuro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Therese RåsbäckDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Thomas RosendalDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Michael StampeFarm and Animal Health, Kungsängens Gård 6B, 753 23, Uppsala, Sweden.
Axel SannöDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Box 7070, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Anna AspánDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Katarina JärneviDepartment of Microbiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
Elina Tast LahtiDepartment of Disease Control and Epidemiology, National Veterinary Institute (SVA), 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden. elina.lahti@sva.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4462-3651

Funding

Swedish Board of Agriculture 2014-4211-620788Swedish Board of Agriculture 2015-4211-5210002
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPigs are the most important reservoir for human pathogenic Yersinia enterocolitica. We investigated the herd prevalence of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in Swedish pig farms by analysing pen faecal samples using a cold enrichment of 1 week and thereafter subsequent plating onto chromogenic selective media (CAY agar).

resultsPathogenic Y. enterocolitica was found in 32 (30.5%) of the 105 sampled farms with finisher pigs. Bioserotype 4/O:3 was identified at all but one farm, where 2/O:9 was identified. Pen-prevalence within the positive herds varied from 1/4 to 4/4 pens. The calculated intra-class correlation coefficient ICC (0.89) from a model with a random effect for grouping within herd indicated a very high degree of clustering by herd. None of the explored risk factors, including herd size, herd type, pig flow, feed type, access to outdoors, evidence of birds and rodents in the herd, usage of straw, number of pigs in sampled pen and age of pigs in pen were significantly associated with Y. enterocolitica status of the pen. The use of high pressure washing with cold water was significantly associated with Y. enterocolitica in the pen (OR = 84.77, 4.05-1772). Two culture methods were assessed for detection of Y. enterocolitica, one of which included the use of a chromogenic agar (CAY agar) intended for detection of human pathogenic Y. enterocolitica. The chromogenic media was found equal or superior to traditional methods and was used in this study. The isolates obtained were characterised by biotyping, serotyping, mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF) and PCR. Characterisation by MALDI-TOF gave identical results to that of conventional bioserotyping. All porcine isolates were positive for the ail and inv genes by PCR, indicating that the isolates were most likely pathogenic to humans.

conclusionsHuman pathogenic Y. enterocolitica was found in nearly one-third of the Swedish pig farms with finisher pigs. The use of high pressure washing with cold water was associated with the presence of Y. enterocolitica in the pen. A modified culturing method using a chromogenic agar was efficient for detection of pathogenic Y. enterocolitica in pig faeces. The use of masspectrometry for identification and subtyping was in agreement with conventional biotyping and serotyping methods.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease ReservoirsFecesPrevalenceSus scrofaSwedenSwineSwine DiseasesYersinia enterocoliticaYersinia InfectionsBiotypingFarmMass spectrometryPigPrevalenceRisk factorsSerotypingYersinia enterocoliticaZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID29940995
PMCPMC6020225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.