Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29940949›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2018

Individual and organizational predictors of allied healthcare providers' job satisfaction in residential long-term care.

Laura D Aloisio, Wendy A Gifford, Katherine S McGilton, Michelle Lalonde, Carole A Estabrooks, Janet E Squires

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Quality assurance in allied healthcare education: A narrative review.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laura D AloisioSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall Room 3051, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada. laloisio@uottawa.ca.
Wendy A GiffordSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall Room 3051, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
Katherine S McGiltonToronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, Lawrence S Bloomberg - Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, 133 Dunn Ave, Toronto, ON, M6K 2R7, Canada.
Michelle LalondeSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall Room 3249B, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.
Carole A EstabrooksFaculty of Nursing, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, University of Alberta, 11405-87 Avenue, Edmonton, AB, T6G 1C9, Canada.
Janet E SquiresSchool of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Roger Guindon Hall Room 3051, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundJob satisfaction is a predictor of intention to stay and turnover among allied healthcare providers. However, there is limited research examining job satisfaction among allied health professionals, specifically in residential long-term care (LTC) settings. The purpose of this study was to identify factors (demographic, individual, and organizational) that predict job satisfaction among allied healthcare providers in residential LTC.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from Phase 2 of the Translating Research in Elder Care program. A total of 334 allied healthcare providers from 77 residential LTC in three Western Canadian provinces were included in the analysis. Generalized estimating equation modeling was used to assess demographics, individual, and organizational context predictors of allied healthcare providers' job satisfaction. We measured job satisfaction using the Michigan Organizational Assessment Questionnaire Job Satisfaction Subscale.

resultsBoth individual and organizational context variables predicted job satisfaction among allied healthcare providers employed in LTC. Demographic variables did not predict job satisfaction. At the individual level, burnout (cynicism) (β = -.113, p = .001) and the competence subscale of psychological empowerment (β = -.224, p = < .001), were predictive of lower job satisfaction levels while higher scores on the meaning (β = .232, p = .001), self-determination (β = .128, p = .005), and impact (β = .10, p = .014) subscales of psychological empowerment predicted higher job satisfaction. Organizational context variables that predicted job satisfaction included: social capital (β = .158, p = .012), organizational slack-time (β = .096, p = .029), and adequate orientation (β = .088, p = .005).

conclusionsThis study suggests that individual allied healthcare provider and organizational context features are both predictive of allied healthcare provider job satisfaction in residential LTC settings. Unlike demographics and structural characteristics of LTC facilities, all variables identified as important to allied healthcare providers' job satisfaction in this study are potentially modifiable, and therefore amenable to intervention.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelJob SatisfactionLong-Term CareAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalCanadaFemaleHumansIntentionMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPower, PsychologicalResidential FacilitiesSurveys and QuestionnairesAllied health professionalsContext-level factorsIndividual-level factorsJob satisfactionLong-term careWork environment

Identifiers

PMID29940949
PMCPMC6019323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.