Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29940882›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2018

Signs and symptoms of disordered eating in pregnancy: a Delphi consensus study.

Amy Jean Bannatyne, Roger Hughes, Peta Stapleton, Bruce Watt, Kristen MacKenzie-Shalders

Abstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Amy Jean BannatyneSchool of Psychology, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia. abannaty@bond.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4573-6199
Roger HughesSchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, 17 Liverpool Street, Hobart, TAS, 7001, Australia.
Peta StapletonSchool of Psychology, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Bruce WattSchool of Psychology, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.
Kristen MacKenzie-ShaldersFaculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, 14 University Drive, Robina, QLD, 4229, Australia.

Funding

Department of Education and Training, Australian Government (AU) Research Training Program Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to establish consensus on the expression and distinction of disordered eating in pregnancy to improve awareness across various health professions and inform the development of a pregnancy-specific assessment instrument.

methodsA three-round modified Delphi method was used with two independent panels. International clinicians and researchers with extensive knowledge on and/or clinical experience with eating disorders formed the first panel and were recruited using structured selection criteria. Women who identified with a lived experience of disordered eating in pregnancy formed the second panel and were recruited via expressions of interest from study advertising on pregnancy forums and social media platforms. A systematic search of academic and grey literature produced 200 sources which were used to pre-populate the Round I questionnaire. Additional items were included in Round II based on panel feedback in Round I. Consensus was defined as 75% agreement on an item.

resultsOf the 102 items presented to the 26 professional panel members and 15 consumer panel members, 75 reached consensus across both panels. Both panels clearly identified signs and symptoms of disordered eating in pregnancy and endorsed a number of clinical features practitioners should consider when delineating disordered eating symptomatically from normative pregnancy experiences.

conclusionA list of signs and symptoms in consensus was identified. The areas of collective agreement may be used to guide clinicians in clinical practice, aid the development of psychometric tools to detect/assess pregnancy-specific disordered eating, in addition to serving as starting point for the development of a core outcome set to measure disordered eating in pregnancy.

Indexed as

AdultDelphi TechniqueDiagnosis, DifferentialFeeding and Eating DisordersFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAntenatalDefinitionDelphiDisordered eatingDistinctionEating disordersPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID29940882
PMCPMC6019208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.