Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29940857›Full record

ArticleBMC neuroscience2018

Late administration of high-frequency electrical stimulation increases nerve regeneration without aggravating neuropathic pain in a nerve crush injury.

Hong-Lin Su, Chien-Yi Chiang, Zong-Han Lu, Fu-Chou Cheng, Chun-Jung Chen, Meei-Ling Sheu, Jason Sheehan, Hung-Chuan Pan

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05923957 (The Impact of High Frequency Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Chiropractic Care on Sciatic Axonal Lesion Presenting as Painful Leg), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05923957 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of High Frequency Electrical Nerve Stimulation and Chiropractic Care on Sciatic Axonal Lesion Presenting as Painful Leg: Case Report

TypeobservationalSponsorPrince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz UniversityRan2023 to 2023Enrolled1ConditionsSciatica PainArmsTENS and Exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. [Progress of electrical stimulation to promote peripheral nerve regeneration].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Bioelectricity in dental medicine: a narrative review.Biomedical engineering online · 2024
    Review
  10. Heterologous fibrin biopolymer as an emerging approach to peripheral nerve repair: a scoping review.The journal of venomous animals and toxins including tropical diseases · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Hong-Lin SuDepartment of Life Sciences, Agriculture Biotechnology Center, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chien-Yi ChiangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Zong-Han LuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan.
Fu-Chou ChengDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Chun-Jung ChenDepartment of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.
Meei-Ling SheuInstitute of Biomedical Sciences, National Chung-Hsing University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Jason SheehanDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Hung-Chuan PanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 1650 Taiwan Boulevard Sec. 4, 40705, Taichung, Taiwan. hcpan2003@yahoo.com.tw.ORCID 0000-0003-3021-7676
Taichung Veterans General Hospital · TWNational Chung Hsing University · TWNational Yang Ming Chiao Tung University · TWUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-frequency transcutaneous neuromuscular electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is currently used for the administration of electrical current in denervated muscle to alleviate muscle atrophy and enhance motor function; however, the time window (i.e. either immediate or delayed) for achieving benefit is still undetermined. In this study, we conducted an intervention of sciatic nerve crush injury using high-frequency TENS at different time points to assess the effect of motor and sensory functional recovery.

resultsAnimals with left sciatic nerve crush injury received TENS treatment starting immediately after injury or 1 week later at a high frequency(100 Hz) or at a low frequency (2 Hz) as a control. In SFI gait analysis, either immediate or late admission of high-frequency electrical stimulation exerted significant improvement compared to either immediate or late administration of low-frequency electrical stimulation. In an assessment of allodynia, immediate high frequency electrical stimulation caused a significantly decreased pain threshold compared to late high-frequency or low-frequency stimulation at immediate or late time points. Immunohistochemistry staining and western blot analysis of S-100 and NF-200 demonstrated that both immediate and late high frequency electrical stimulation showed a similar effect; however the effect was superior to that achieved with low frequency stimulation. Immediate high frequency electrical stimulation resulted in significant expression of TNF-α and synaptophysin in the dorsal root ganglion, somatosensory cortex, and hippocampus compared to late electrical stimulation, and this trend paralleled the observed effect on somatosensory evoked potential. The CatWalk gait analysis also showed that immediate electrical stimulation led to a significantly high regularity index. In primary dorsal root ganglion cells culture, high-frequency electrical stimulation also exerted a significant increase in expression of TNF-α, synaptophysin, and NGF in accordance with the in vivo results.

conclusionImmediate or late transcutaneous high-frequency electrical stimulation exhibited the potential to stimulate the motor nerve regeneration. However, immediate electrical stimulation had a predilection to develop neuropathic pain. A delay in TENS initiation appears to be a reasonable approach for nerve repair and provides the appropriate time profile for its clinical application.

Indexed as

Transcutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationAnimalsCrush InjuriesElectric StimulationEvoked Potentials, SomatosensoryMaleNerve RegenerationNeuralgiaRats, Sprague-DawleySciatic NerveSciatic NeuropathyDorsal root ganglion cellNerve regenerationNeuropathic painTranscutaneous electrical stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29940857
PMCPMC6020201
OpenAlexW2810116099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.