Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29940004›Full record

ArticlePloS one2018

A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research, 2007-2016.

Vaidehi Nafade, Madlen Nash, Sophie Huddart, Tripti Pande, Nebiat Gebreselassie, Christian Lienhardt, Madhukar Pai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Relationship between Aging and Ketogenic Diet: A Bibliometric Analysis (1995-2025)Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Missed Nuances in Tuberculosis Research: Reflections from a Tibetan Scholar.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. A bibliometric analysis of research on the health impacts of ozone air pollution.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  11. Global research trends in central nervous system tuberculosis - A bibliometric analysis.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vaidehi NafadeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Madlen NashDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Sophie HuddartDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Tripti PandeMcGill International TB Centre, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.
Nebiat GebreselassieGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Christian LienhardtGlobal TB Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Madhukar PaiDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3667-4536

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTuberculosis (TB) research is a key component of the End TB Strategy. To track research output, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of TB research from the past decade.

methodsThe Web of Science database was searched for publications from January 2007 to December 2016 with "tuberculosis" in the title. References were analysed using the R bibliometrix package. A year-stratified 5% random subset was drawn to extract funding sources and identify research areas.

findingsThe annual growth rate of publications was 7.3%, and was highest (13.1%) among Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa (BRICS). The USA was the most productive country, with 18.4% of references, followed by India (9.7%), China (7.3%), England (6.5%), and South Africa (3.9%). In the subset analysis, the most common research area was 'fundamental research' (33.8%). Frequently acknowledged funders were US and EU-based, with China and India emerging as top funders. Collaborations appeared more frequently between high-income countries and low/medium income countries (LMICs), with fewer collaborations among LMICs.

conclusionThe past decade has seen a continued increase in TB publications. While USA continues to dominate research output and funding, BRICS countries have emerged as major research producers and funders. Collaborations among BRICS would enhance future TB research productivity.

Indexed as

Databases, BibliographicData MiningTuberculosisAnimalsBiomedical ResearchHumans

Identifiers

PMID29940004
PMCPMC6016906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.