Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29939912›Full record

Trial reportMedical care2018

Why Effective Interventions Do Not Work for All Patients: Exploring Variation in Response to a Chronic Disease Management Intervention.

Merritt Edlind, Nandita Mitra, David Grande, Frances K Barg, Tamala Carter, Lindsey Turr, Karen Glanz, Judith A Long, Shreya Kangovi

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medical care, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Developing a research agenda for social prescribing in the UK using lessons from the US.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Merritt EdlindDepartments of Medicine.
Nandita MitraBiostatistics and Epidemiology.
David GrandeDepartments of Medicine.
Frances K BargFamily Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine.
Tamala CarterPenn Center for Community Health Workers, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, PA.
Lindsey TurrDepartments of Medicine.
Karen GlanzBiostatistics and Epidemiology.
Judith A LongDepartments of Medicine.
Shreya KangoviDepartments of Medicine.

Funding

Modifying Behavioral Response to Failure among Patients with Cardiovascular Disease Risk FactorsK23HL128837 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI KANGOVI, SHREYA · 2016 to 2019
$695k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL128837
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHalf of all Americans have a chronic disease. Promoting healthy behaviors to decrease this burden is a national priority. A number of behavioral interventions have proven efficacy; yet even the most effective of these has high levels of nonresponse.

objectivesIn this study, we explore variation in response to an evidence-based community health worker (CHW) intervention for chronic disease management. RESEARCH

designWe used a convergent parallel design that combined a randomized controlled trial with a qualitative process evaluation that triangulated chart abstraction, in-depth interviews and participant observation. SUBJECTS: Eligible patients lived in a high-poverty region and were diagnosed with 2 or more of the following chronic diseases: diabetes, obesity, hypertension or tobacco dependence. There were 302 patients in the trial, 150 of whom were randomly assigned to the CHW intervention. Twenty patients and their CHWs were included in the qualitative evaluation.

resultsWe found minimal differences between responders and nonresponders by sociodemographic or clinical characteristics. A qualitative process evaluation revealed that health behavior change was challenging for all patients and most experienced failure (ie, gaining weight or relapsing with cigarettes) along the way. Responders seemed to increase their resolve after failed attempts at health behavior change, while nonresponders became discouraged and "shut down."

conclusionsFailure is a common and consequential aspect of health behavior change; a deeper understanding of failure should inform chronic disease interventions.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorAdultChronic DiseaseCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient CompliancePovertyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID29939912
PMCPMC6041152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.