ArticleEcological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America2018
Engineered nanoparticles interact with nutrients to intensify eutrophication in a wetland ecosystem experiment.
Article in Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trophic status as a factor in phytoplankton resilience to the toxic effects of zinc oxide nanoparticles.Folia microbiologica · 2026Article
- Advancing Aquatic Ecotoxicology Testing of Anticancer Drugs Through Mesocosms.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Impact on Some Soil Physical and Chemical Properties Caused by Metal and Metallic Oxide Engineered Nanoparticles: A Review.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Potential use of engineered nanoparticles in ocean fertilization for large-scale atmospheric carbon dioxide removal.Nature nanotechnology · 2022Article
- Study of the Stability of Citrate Capped AgNPs in Several Environmental Water Matrices by Asymmetrical Flow Field Flow Fractionation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Article
- Gold nanoparticle biodissolution by a freshwater macrophyte and its associated microbiome.Nature nanotechnology · 2018Article
- Plant and Microbial Responses to Repeated Cu(OH)Frontiers in microbiology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite the rapid rise in diversity and quantities of engineered nanomaterials produced, the impacts of these emerging contaminants on the structure and function of ecosystems have received little attention from ecologists. Moreover, little is known about how manufactured nanomaterials may interact with nutrient pollution in altering ecosystem productivity, despite the recognition that eutrophication is the primary water quality issue in freshwater ecosystems worldwide. In this study, we asked two main questions: (1) To what extent do manufactured nanoparticles affect the biomass and productivity of primary producers in wetland ecosystems? (2) How are these impacts mediated by nutrient pollution? To address these questions, we examined the impacts of a citrate-coated gold nanoparticle (AuNPs) and of a commercial pesticide containing Cu(OH)
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.