ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2019
A descriptive marker gene approach to single-cell pseudotime inference.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multiregional profiling revealsScience advances · 2026Article
- CeLLTra: aligning cell names with gene expression via a pathway-informed transformer.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- A novel paradigm for single-cell annotation in stem cell research.Stem cell reports · 2025Review
- A semi-supervised Bayesian approach for marker gene trajectory inference from single-cell RNA-seq data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Trajectory inference from single-cell genomics data with a process time model.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Unlocking hematopoietic stem cell potential: integrative computational approaches for genomic and transcriptomic analysis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2025Review
- Article
- Article
- scRNA-seq Reveals Novel Genetic Pathways and Sex Chromosome Regulation in Tribolium Spermatogenesis.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Defining the identity and the niches of epithelial stem cells with highly pleiotropic multilineage potency in the human thymus.Developmental cell · 2023Article
- Trajectory reconstruction identifies dysregulation of perinatal maturation programs in pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes.Cell reports · 2023Article
- Length biases in single-cell RNA sequencing of pre-mRNA.Biophysical reports · 2023Article
- BLTSA: pseudotime prediction for single cells by branched local tangent space alignment.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A comprehensive single-cell map of T cell exhaustion-associated immune environments in human breast cancer.Nature communications · 2023Article
- UniTVelo: temporally unified RNA velocity reinforces single-cell trajectory inference.Nature communications · 2022Article
- RNA velocity unraveled.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Single-cell and single-nuclei RNA sequencing as powerful tools to decipher cellular heterogeneity and dysregulation in neurodegenerative diseases.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Review
- Transcriptional signature in microglia associated with Aβ plaque phagocytosis.Nature communications · 2021Article
- The circadian oscillator analysed at the single-transcript level.Molecular systems biology · 2021Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Motivation: Pseudotime estimation from single-cell gene expression data allows the recovery of temporal information from otherwise static profiles of individual cells. Conventional pseudotime inference methods emphasize an unsupervised transcriptome-wide approach and use retrospective analysis to evaluate the behaviour of individual genes. However, the resulting trajectories can only be understood in terms of abstract geometric structures and not in terms of interpretable models of gene behaviour. Results: Here we introduce an orthogonal Bayesian approach termed 'Ouija' that learns pseudotimes from a small set of marker genes that might ordinarily be used to retrospectively confirm the accuracy of unsupervised pseudotime algorithms. Crucially, we model these genes in terms of switch-like or transient behaviour along the trajectory, allowing us to understand why the pseudotimes have been inferred and learn informative parameters about the behaviour of each gene. Since each gene is associated with a switch or peak time the genes are effectively ordered along with the cells, allowing each part of the trajectory to be understood in terms of the behaviour of certain genes. We demonstrate that this small panel of marker genes can recover pseudotimes that are consistent with those obtained using the entire transcriptome. Furthermore, we show that our method can detect differences in the regulation timings between two genes and identify 'metastable' states-discrete cell types along the continuous trajectories-that recapitulate known cell types. Availability and implementation: An open source implementation is available as an R package at http://www.github.com/kieranrcampbell/ouija and as a Python/TensorFlow package at http://www.github.com/kieranrcampbell/ouijaflow. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.