Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938824›Full record

ArticleMedical education2018

Investigating US medical students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism.

Marianne Mak-van der Vossen, Arianne Teherani, Walther N K A van Mook, Gerda Croiset, Rashmi A Kusurkar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical education, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. A behavioural study of obedience in health professional students.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marianne Mak-van der VossenDepartment of Research in Education, VUmc School of Medical Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7810-6575
Arianne TeheraniCenter for Faculty as Educators, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Walther N K A van MookDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Gerda CroisetFaculty of Medical Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Rashmi A KusurkarDepartment of Research in Education, VUmc School of Medical Sciences, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9382-0379

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextAs unprofessional behaviour in physicians can compromise patient safety, all physicians should be willing and able to respond to lapses in professionalism. Although students endorse an obligation to respond to lapses, they experience difficulties in doing so. If medical educators knew how students respond and why they choose certain responses, they could support students in responding appropriately.

objectivesThe aim of this study was to describe medical students' responses to professionalism lapses in peers and faculty staff, and to understand students' motivation for responding or not responding.

methodsWe conducted an explorative, qualitative study using template analysis, in which three researchers independently coded transcripts of semi-structured, face-to-face interviews. We purposefully sampled 18 student representatives convening at a medical education conference. Preliminary open coding of a data subset yielded an initial template, which was applied to further data and modified as necessary. All transcripts were coded using the final template. Finally, three sensitising concepts from the Expectancy-Value-Cost model were used to map participants' responses.

resultsStudents mentioned having observed lapses in professionalism in both faculty staff and peers. Students' responses to these lapses were avoiding, addressing, reporting or initiating policy change. Generally, students were not motivated to respond if they did not know how to respond, if they believed responding was futile and if they feared retaliation. Students were motivated to respond if they were personally affected, if they perceived the individual as approachable and if they thought that the whole group of students could benefit from their actions. Expectancy of success, value and costs each appeared to be influenced by (inter)personal and system factors.

conclusionsThe Expectancy-Value-Cost model effectively explains students' motivation for responding to lapses. The (inter)personal and system factors influencing students' motivation to respond are modifiable and can be used by medical educators to enhance students' motivation to respond to lapses in professionalism observed in medical school.

Indexed as

MotivationProfessional MisconductHumansInterviews as TopicPatient SafetyProfessionalismQualitative ResearchStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID29938824
PMCPMC6055660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.