Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938537›Full record

ReviewAstrobiology2018

Exoplanet Biosignatures: Observational Prospects.

Yuka Fujii, Daniel Angerhausen, Russell Deitrick, Shawn Domagal-Goldman, John Lee Grenfell, Yasunori Hori, Stephen R Kane, Enric Pallé, Heike Rauer, Nicholas Siegler and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Astrobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. A first look at rocky exoplanets with JWST.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  2. Modelling exo-biospheres for biosignature predictions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Quantifying the information impact of future searches for exoplanetary biosignatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  10. An objective Bayesian analysis of life's early start and our late arrival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yuka Fujii1 NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies , New York, New York, USA .
Daniel Angerhausen3 CSH Fellow for Exoplanetary Astronomy, Center for Space and Habitability (CSH) , Universität Bern, Bern, Switzerland .
Russell Deitrick5 Department of Astronomy, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington, USA .
Shawn Domagal-Goldman6 NASA Astrobiology Institute's Virtual Planetary Laboratory .
John Lee Grenfell8 Department of Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres (EPA), Institute of Planetary Research , German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin, Germany .
Yasunori Hori9 Astrobiology Center, National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS) , Mitaka, Tokyo, Japan .
Stephen R Kane10 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California , Riverside, California, USA .
Enric Pallé11 Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias , La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain .
Heike Rauer8 Department of Extrasolar Planets and Atmospheres (EPA), Institute of Planetary Research , German Aerospace Centre (DLR), Berlin, Germany .
Nicholas Siegler14 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California, USA .
Karl Stapelfeldt14 Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, California, USA .
Kevin B Stevenson16 Space Telescope Science Institute , Baltimore, Maryland, USA .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exoplanet hunting efforts have revealed the prevalence of exotic worlds with diverse properties, including Earth-sized bodies, which has fueled our endeavor to search for life beyond the Solar System. Accumulating experiences in astrophysical, chemical, and climatological characterization of uninhabitable planets are paving the way to characterization of potentially habitable planets. In this paper, we review our possibilities and limitations in characterizing temperate terrestrial planets with future observational capabilities through the 2030s and beyond, as a basis of a broad range of discussions on how to advance "astrobiology" with exoplanets. We discuss the observability of not only the proposed biosignature candidates themselves but also of more general planetary properties that provide circumstantial evidence, since the evaluation of any biosignature candidate relies on its context. Characterization of temperate Earth-sized planets in the coming years will focus on those around nearby late-type stars. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and later 30-meter-class ground-based telescopes will empower their chemical investigations. Spectroscopic studies of potentially habitable planets around solar-type stars will likely require a designated spacecraft mission for direct imaging, leveraging technologies that are already being developed and tested as part of the Wide Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission. Successful initial characterization of a few nearby targets will be an important touchstone toward a more detailed scrutiny and a larger survey that are envisioned beyond 2030. The broad outlook this paper presents may help develop new observational techniques to detect relevant features as well as frameworks to diagnose planets based on the observables. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Characterization-Planetary atmospheres-Planetary surfaces. Astrobiology 18, 739-778.

Indexed as

ExobiologyExtraterrestrial EnvironmentPlanetsGasesModels, TheoreticalGases

Identifiers

PMID29938537
PMCPMC6016572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.