ReviewAstrobiology2018
Exoplanet Biosignatures: Observational Prospects.
Review in Astrobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- A first look at rocky exoplanets with JWST.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Modelling exo-biospheres for biosignature predictions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Completing the Spectral Mosaic of Chloromethane by Adding the CHDMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Biological, Equilibrium and Photochemical Signatures of C, N and S Isotopes in the Early Earth and Exoplanet Atmospheres.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
- Schrödinger and the Possible Existence of Different Types of Life.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Introduction-First Billion Years: Habitability.Astrobiology · 2021Review
- Article
- Quantifying the information impact of future searches for exoplanetary biosignatures.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- An objective Bayesian analysis of life's early start and our late arrival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020Article
- A Complex Life Habitable Zone Based On Lipid Solubility Theory.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Extremophilic models for astrobiology: haloarchaeal survival strategies and pigments for remote sensing.Extremophiles : life under extreme conditions · 2020Review
- Exoplanet Biosignatures: At the Dawn of a New Era of Planetary Observations.Astrobiology · 2018Article
- Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Review of Remotely Detectable Signs of Life.Astrobiology · 2018Review
- Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment.Astrobiology · 2018Review
- Exoplanet Biosignatures: Future Directions.Astrobiology · 2018Review
- Exoplanet Biosignatures: Understanding Oxygen as a Biosignature in the Context of Its Environment.Astrobiology · 2018Review
- Disequilibrium biosignatures over Earth history and implications for detecting exoplanet life.Science advances · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Exoplanet hunting efforts have revealed the prevalence of exotic worlds with diverse properties, including Earth-sized bodies, which has fueled our endeavor to search for life beyond the Solar System. Accumulating experiences in astrophysical, chemical, and climatological characterization of uninhabitable planets are paving the way to characterization of potentially habitable planets. In this paper, we review our possibilities and limitations in characterizing temperate terrestrial planets with future observational capabilities through the 2030s and beyond, as a basis of a broad range of discussions on how to advance "astrobiology" with exoplanets. We discuss the observability of not only the proposed biosignature candidates themselves but also of more general planetary properties that provide circumstantial evidence, since the evaluation of any biosignature candidate relies on its context. Characterization of temperate Earth-sized planets in the coming years will focus on those around nearby late-type stars. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) and later 30-meter-class ground-based telescopes will empower their chemical investigations. Spectroscopic studies of potentially habitable planets around solar-type stars will likely require a designated spacecraft mission for direct imaging, leveraging technologies that are already being developed and tested as part of the Wide Field InfraRed Survey Telescope (WFIRST) mission. Successful initial characterization of a few nearby targets will be an important touchstone toward a more detailed scrutiny and a larger survey that are envisioned beyond 2030. The broad outlook this paper presents may help develop new observational techniques to detect relevant features as well as frameworks to diagnose planets based on the observables. Key Words: Exoplanets-Biosignatures-Characterization-Planetary atmospheres-Planetary surfaces. Astrobiology 18, 739-778.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.