Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938340›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2018

Investigating the effect of STN-DBS stimulation and different frequency settings on the acoustic-articulatory features of vowels.

Atilla Yilmaz, Elif Tuğba Sarac, Fatma Esen Aydinli, Mustafa Turgut Yildizgoren, Emine Esra Okuyucu, Yurdal Serarslan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 41% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Atilla YilmazDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Anatakya, Hatay, Turkey. atillayilmaz@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1081-3545
Elif Tuğba SaracDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey.
Fatma Esen AydinliDepartment of Speech and Language Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Mustafa Turgut YildizgorenDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey.
Emine Esra OkuyucuDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey.
Yurdal SerarslanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Mustafa Kemal University, Anatakya, Hatay, Turkey.
Mustafa Kemal University · TRHacettepe University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParkinson's disease (PD) is the second most frequent progressive neuro-degenerative disorder. In addition to motor symptoms, nonmotor symptoms and voice and speech disorders can also develop in 90% of PD patients. The aim of our study was to investigate the effects of DBS and different DBS frequencies on speech acoustics of vowels in PD patients.

methodsThe study included 16 patients who underwent STN-DBS surgery due to PD. The voice recordings for the vowels including [a], [e], [i], and [o] were performed at frequencies including 230, 130, 90, and 60 Hz and off-stimulation. The voice recordings were gathered and evaluated by the Praat software, and the effects on the first (F1), second (F2), and third formant (F3) frequencies were analyzed.

resultsA significant difference was found for the F1 value of the vowel [a] at 130 Hz compared to off-stimulation. However, no significant difference was found between the three formant frequencies with regard to the stimulation frequencies and off-stimulation. In addition, though not statistically significant, stimulation at 60 and 230 Hz led to several differences in the formant frequencies of other three vowels.

conclusionOur results indicated that STN-DBS stimulation at 130 Hz had a significant positive effect on articulation of [a] compared to off-stimulation. Although there is not any statistical significant stimulation at 60 and 230 Hz may also have an effect on the articulation of [e], [i], and [o] but this effect needs to be investigated in future studies with higher numbers of participants.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationPhoneticsSpeech AcousticsSubthalamic NucleusAdultAgedArticulation DisordersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedParkinson DiseaseTreatment OutcomeAcoustic-articulatory featuresDBSDeep brain stimulationParkinson’s diseaseSpeechSubthalamic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID29938340
OpenAlexW2810394645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.