Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938321›Full record

ReviewCurrent heart failure reports2018

Prevention of Cardiotoxicities With Traditional and Novel Chemotherapeutic Agents.

Zarina Sharalaya, Patrick Collier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current heart failure reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zarina SharalayaRobert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart and Vascular Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk J1-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
Patrick CollierRobert and Suzanne Tomsich Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Sydell and Arnold Miller Family Heart and Vascular Institute, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Desk J1-5, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA. colliep@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review will discuss strategies to prevent cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapeutics. Forty years ago, investigators identified dose-dependent cardiotoxicity related to anthracycline-based regimens. Over recent decades, the development of more selective, mechanism-based chemotherapeutics has been associated with both on-target and off-target adverse cardiovascular sequelae. RECENT

findingsStrategies to prevent or attenuate cardiotoxicities include limitation of anthracycline dose, appropriate patient selection, referral/access to cardio-oncology programs, early recognition of cardiac side effects, active cardio-surveillance, cardio-protective medical therapy, treatment-specific concerns, and follow-up. The importance of accurate diagnosis of cardiotoxicity is important as false-positive testing may result in inappropriate holding or stopping potentially life-saving chemotherapy. Data to support use of cardio-protective medical therapy to prevent chemotherapy-related cardiotoxicity is modest at best, limited by marginal effect size, small patient numbers, and short follow-up. The rapid growth in cardio-oncology clinics may facilitate larger multi-center randomized controlled trials in this area.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCardiotoxicityHeart DiseasesHumansNeoplasmsRisk FactorsAntineoplastic AgentsAnthracyclineCardiomyopathyCardiotoxicityChemotherapyHeart failureNovel chemotherapeuticsPrevention

Identifiers

PMID29938321
OpenAlexW2810250060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.