Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938298›Full record

ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2019

Bridging the Gap in Global Advanced Radiation Oncology Training: Impact of a Web-Based Open-Access Interactive Three-Dimensional Contouring Atlas on Radiation Oncologist Practice in Russia.

Shearwood McClelland, Marina Chernykh, Natalia Dengina, Erin F Gillespie, Anna Likhacheva, Sergey Usychkin, Alexandr Pankratov, Ekaterina Kharitonova, Yulia Egorova, Ilya Tsimafeyeu and 3 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Technology-Enhanced Learning in the Education of Oncology Medical Professionals: A Systematic Literature Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Education in Radiation Oncology-Current Challenges and Difficulties.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Development and Usage ofJCO clinical cancer informatics · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Shearwood McClellandDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L337, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA. drwood@post.harvard.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7951-9726
Marina ChernykhN.N. Blohin National Medical Research Center of Oncology, Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia.
Natalia DenginaInternational Design and Implementation Group for Radiation Oncology Workshops (INDIGO), Trubnaya street, 25/1, Moscow, Russia.
Erin F GillespieMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anna LikhachevaInternational Design and Implementation Group for Radiation Oncology Workshops (INDIGO), Trubnaya street, 25/1, Moscow, Russia.
Sergey UsychkinInternational Design and Implementation Group for Radiation Oncology Workshops (INDIGO), Trubnaya street, 25/1, Moscow, Russia.
Alexandr PankratovInternational Design and Implementation Group for Radiation Oncology Workshops (INDIGO), Trubnaya street, 25/1, Moscow, Russia.
Ekaterina KharitonovaRussian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), Moscow, Russia.
Yulia EgorovaRussian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), Moscow, Russia.
Ilya TsimafeyeuRussian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), Moscow, Russia.
Sergei TjulandinRussian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), Moscow, Russia.
Charles R ThomasDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L337, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.
Timur MitinDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L337, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation oncologists in Russia face a number of unique professional difficulties including lack of standardized training and continuing medical education. To combat this, under the auspices of the Russian Society of Clinical Oncology (RUSSCO), our group has developed a series of ongoing in-person interactive contouring workshops that are held during the major Russian oncology conferences in Moscow, Russia. Since November 2016 during each workshop, we utilized a web-based open-access interactive three-dimensional contouring atlas as part of our didactics. We sought to determine the impact of this resource on radiation oncology practice in Russia. We distributed an IRB-approved web-based survey to 172 practicing radiation oncologists in Russia. We inquired about practice demographics, RUSSCO contouring workshop attendance, and the clinical use of open-access English language interactive contouring atlas (eContour). The survey remained open for 2 months until November 2017. Eighty radiation oncologists completed the survey with a 46.5% response rate. Mean number of years in practice was 13.7. Sixty respondents (75%) attended at least one RUSSCO contouring workshop. Of those who were aware of eContour, 76% were introduced during a RUSSCO contouring workshop, and 81% continue to use it in their daily practice. The greatest obstacles to using the program were language barrier (51%) and internet access (38%). Nearly 90% reported their contouring practices changed since they started using the program, particularly for delineation of clinical target volumes (57%) and/or organs at risk (46%). More than 97% found the clinical pearls/links to cooperative group protocols in the software helpful in their daily practice. The majority used the contouring program several times per month (43%) or several times per week (41%). Face-to-face contouring instruction in combination with open-access web-based interactive contouring resource had a meaningful impact on perceived quality of radiation oncology contours among Russian practitioners and has the potential to have applications worldwide.

Indexed as

AnatomyClinical CompetenceHumansInternetNeoplasmsOrgans at RiskPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Radiation OncologistsRadiation OncologyRussiaSurveys and QuestionnairesClinical target volumeeContour.orgGlobal oncologyOrgans at riskRadiation oncologyRUSSCORussia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.