Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938217›Full record

ArticleScience advances2018

Extensive marine anoxia during the terminal Ediacaran Period.

Feifei Zhang, Shuhai Xiao, Brian Kendall, Stephen J Romaniello, Huan Cui, Mike Meyer, Geoffrey J Gilleaudeau, Alan J Kaufman, Ariel D Anbar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Environmental drivers of the first major animal extinction across the Ediacaran White Sea-Nama transition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Ancient life and moving fluids.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Feifei ZhangSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3277-445X
Shuhai XiaoDepartment of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4655-2663
Brian KendallDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.
Stephen J RomanielloSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1582-6801
Huan CuiDepartment of Geoscience and NASA Astrobiology Institute, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0705-3423
Mike MeyerCarnegie Institution for Science, Washington, DC 20005, USA.
Geoffrey J GilleaudeauSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8131-8915
Alan J KaufmanGeology Department and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4129-6445
Ariel D AnbarSchool of Earth and Space Exploration, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6015-7750

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The terminal Ediacaran Period witnessed the decline of the Ediacara biota (which may have included many stem-group animals). To test whether oceanic anoxia might have played a role in this evolutionary event, we measured U isotope compositions (δ

Identifiers

PMID29938217
PMCPMC6010336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.