Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938211›Full record

ArticleCogent medicine2018

Trial of infographics in Northern Ireland (TINI): Preliminary evaluation and results of a randomized controlled trial comparing infographics with text.

Alan David McCrorie, Jingwen Jessica Chen, Ross Weller, Kieran John McGlade, Conan Donnelly

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cogent medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alan David McCrorieSchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Jingwen Jessica ChenSchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Ross WellerSchool of Medicine, Dentistry, and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Kieran John McGladeDepartment of General Practice and Primary Care, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Conan DonnellyN. Ireland Cancer Registry, Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK A14000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Infographics represent a potential means of improving public knowledge about cancer. However, there is little experimental evidence of their efficacy. This preliminary study investigates whether infographics are superior to text for the communication of information about cancer risk in old age via a three armed randomized controlled trial. Trial involved allocation concealment and block randomization of 30 male participants aged over 50 to receive text information (control) or one of two infographics (interventions). Participants who viewed an infographic were more likely to know the correct association between cancer risk and old age compared with those viewing text information (risk ratio = 3.0, 95% confidence interval 0.82-10.90). Participants had limited understanding of the phrases "cancer incidence" and "cancer prevalence" but good understanding of the phrases "cancer risk factor" and "cancer stage." Possession of good numerical skills appears to be a key determinant of ability to extract meaning from statistical information provided; regardless of format. Initial results suggest icon array infographics may be more effective communication mediums than text but further study with more participants and an updated infographic is necessary to confirm this finding. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN33951209.

Indexed as

CancercommunicationDecision AnalysisevidenceHealth CommunicationHealth Informatics and StatisticsinfographicMedical StatisticsPublic Health – Medical SociologystatisticsStatistics and Probabilitytrial

Identifiers

PMID29938211
PMCPMC6002148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.