ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2018
The Induction of Bone Formation: The Translation Enigma.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Recapitulation ofJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Article
- It is not waste if it is therapy: cellular, secretory and functional properties of reamer-irrigator-aspirator (RIA)-derived autologous bone grafts.Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2025Article
- An innovative intramedullary bone graft harvesting concept as a fundamental component of scaffold-guided bone regeneration: A preclinicalJournal of orthopaedic translation · 2024Article
- Long bone uninfected non-union: grafting techniques.EFORT open reviews · 2024Review
- The 3D-McMap Guidelines: Three-Dimensional Multicomposite Microsphere Adaptive Printing.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Application of dental pulp stem cells for bone regeneration.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Review
- An in vivo study to investigate an original intramedullary bone graft harvesting technology.European journal of medical research · 2023Article
- The Concept of Scaffold-Guided Bone Regeneration for the Treatment of Long Bone Defects: Current Clinical Application and Future Perspective.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Review
- Osteochondrogenesis by TGF-β3, BMP-2 and noggin growth factor combinations in anFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Article
- Clinical translation of a patient-specific scaffold-guided bone regeneration concept in four cases with large long bone defects.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2022Article
- Nano-Hydroxyapatite Bone Scaffolds with Different Porous Structures Processed by Digital Light Processing 3D Printing.International journal of bioprinting · 2022Article
- Innovative Molecular and Cellular Therapeutics in Cleft Palate Tissue Engineering.Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews · 2021Review
- Synergistic interaction of hTGF-βBMC biotechnology · 2020Article
- Temporal TGF-β Supergene Family Signalling Cues Modulating Tissue Morphogenesis: Chondrogenesis within a Muscle Tissue Model?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Trauma induced tissue survival in vitro with a muscle-biomaterial based osteogenic organoid system: a proof of concept study.BMC biotechnology · 2020Article
- 3D Printing of Bioceramic Scaffolds-Barriers to the Clinical Translation: From Promise to Reality, and Future Perspectives.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- Current Progress on MicroRNA-Based Gene Delivery in the Treatment of Osteoporosis and Osteoporotic Fracture.International journal of endocrinology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A paradigmatic shift in the way of thinking is what bone tissue engineering science requires to decrypt the translation conundrum from animal models into human. The deductive work of Urist (1965), who discerned the principle of bone induction from the pioneering works of Senn, Huggins, Lacroix, Levander, and other bone regenerative scientists, provided the basis that has assisted future bone tissue regenerative scientists to extend the bone tissue engineering field and its potential uses for bone regenerative medicine in humans. However, major challenges remain that are preventing the formation of bone by induction clinically. Growing experimental evidence is indicating that bone inductive studies are non-translatable from animal models into a clinical environment. This is preventing bone tissue engineering from reaching the next phase in development. Countless studies are trying to discern how the formation of bone by induction functions mechanistically, so as to try and solve this enigmatic problem. However, are the correct questions being asked? Why do bone inductive animal studies not translate into humans? Why do bone induction principles not yield the same extent of bone formation as an autogenous bone graft? What are bone tissue engineering scientists missing? By critically re-assessing the past and present discoveries of the bone induction field, this review article attempts to re-discover the field of bone formation by induction, identifying some key features that may have been missed. These include a detailed library of all proteins in bones and their arrangement in the 3D superstructure of the bone together with some other important criteria not considered by tissue engineering scientists. The review therefore not only re-iterates possible avenues of research that need to be re-explored but also seeks to guide present and future scientists in how they assess their own research in light of experimental design and results. By addressing these issues bone formation by induction without autografts might finally become clinically viable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.