Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938098›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

The indestructible insect: Velvet ants from across the United States avoid predation by representatives from all major tetrapod clades.

Brian G Gall, Kari L Spivey, Trevor L Chapman, Robert J Delph, Edmund D Brodie, Joseph S Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Multiple mechanisms of action of an extremely painful venom.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Ultrablack color in velvet ant cuticle.Beilstein journal of nanotechnology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Brian G GallDepartment of Biology Hanover College Hanover Indiana.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-6840
Kari L SpiveyDepartment of Biology Missouri State University Springfield Missouri.
Trevor L ChapmanDepartment of Biology East Tennessee State University Johnson City Tennessee.
Robert J DelphDepartment of Natural Resources U.S. Army Dugway Proving Ground Dugway Utah.
Edmund D BrodieDepartment of Biology Utah State University Logan Utah.
Joseph S WilsonDepartment of Biology Utah State University-Tooele Tooele Utah.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Velvet ants are a group of parasitic wasps that are well known for a suite of defensive adaptations including bright coloration and a formidable sting. While these adaptations are presumed to function in antipredator defense, observations between potential predators and this group are lacking. We conducted a series of experiments to determine the risk of velvet ants to a host of potential predators including amphibians, reptiles, birds, and small mammals. Velvet ants from across the United States were tested with predator's representative of the velvet ants native range. All interactions between lizards, free-ranging birds, and a mole resulted in the velvet ants survival, and ultimate avoidance by the predator. Two shrews did injure a velvet ant, but this occurred only after multiple failed attacks. The only predator to successfully consume a velvet ant was a single American toad (

Indexed as

antipredatorHymenopteraMutillidaepredator avoidancepredator–prey

Identifiers

PMID29938098
PMCPMC6010712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.