ArticleEcology and evolution2018
Assessment of a livestock GPS collar based on an open-source datalogger informs best practices for logging intensity.
Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Influence of vegetation and weather on livestock distribution in an arid environment.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Article
- Article
- Current approaches in livestock geotagging: Assessing available technologies and applications to public health research in Kenya and Malawi.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
- Application of Precision Technologies to Characterize Animal Behavior: A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Review
- The Behaviour of Sheep around a Natural Waterway and Impact on Water Quality during Winter in New Zealand.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Article
- Convergent Validation of a Self-Reported Commuting to and from School Diary in Spanish Adolescents.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Animal board invited review: Grassland-based livestock farming and biodiversity.Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience · 2022Review
- ASAS-NANP Symposium: Mathematical Modeling in Animal Nutrition: Opportunities and challenges of confined and extensive precision livestock production.Journal of animal science · 2022Review
- Article
- A Range-Based Algorithm for Autonomous Navigation of an Aerial Drone to Approach and Follow a Herd of Cattle.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Developing a Simulated Online Model That Integrates GNSS, Accelerometer and Weather Data to Detect Parturition Events in Grazing Sheep: A Machine Learning Approach.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021Article
- Slope and distance from buildings are easy-to-retrieve proxies for estimating livestock site-use intensity in alpine summer pastures.PloS one · 2021Article
- A Decision Support System for Economically Sustainable Sheep and Goat Farming.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- A Low-Cost IoT-Based System to Monitor the Location of a Whole Herd.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Assessment of a livestock GPS collar based on an open-source datalogger informs best practices for logging intensity.Ecology and evolution · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ecologists have used Global Positioning Systems (GPS) to track animals for 30 years. Issues today include logging frequency and precision in estimating space use and travel distances, as well as battery life and cost. We developed a low-cost (~US$125), open-source GPS datalogger based on Arduino. To test the system, we collected positions at 20-s intervals for several 1-week durations from cattle and sheep on rangeland in North Dakota. We tested two questions of broad interest to ecologists who use GPS collars to track animal movements: (1) How closely do collared animals cluster in their herd? (2) How well do different logging patterns estimate patch occupancy and total daily distance traveled? Tested logging patterns included regular logging (one position every 5 or 10 min), and burst logging (positions recorded at 20-s intervals for 5 or 10 min per hour followed by a sleep period). Collared sheep within the same pasture spent 75% of daytime periods within 51 m of each other (mean = 42 m); collared cattle were within 111 m (mean = 76 m). In our comparison of how well different logging patterns estimate space use versus constant logging, the proportion of positions recorded in 1- and 16-ha patches differed by 2%-3% for burst logging and 1% for regular logging. Although all logging patterns underestimated total daily distance traveled, underestimations were corrected by multiplying estimations by regression coefficients estimated by maximum likelihood. Burst logging can extend battery life by a factor of 7. We conclude that a minimum of two collars programmed with burst logging robustly estimate patch use and spatial distribution of grazing livestock herds. Research questions that require accurately estimating travel of individual animals, however, are probably best addressed with regular logging intervals and will thus have greater battery demands than spatial occupancy questions across all GPS datalogger systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.