Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29938074›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2018

Guano exposed: Impact of aerobic conditions on bat fecal microbiota.

Viacheslav Y Fofanov, Tara N Furstenau, Daniel Sanchez, Crystal M Hepp, Jill Cocking, Colin Sobek, Nicole Pagel, Faith Walker, Carol L Chambers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Insight into the Skin Mycobiota ofAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. The Kidney-Associated Microbiome of Wild-CaughtAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Viacheslav Y FofanovSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Tara N FurstenauSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.ORCID 0000-0001-5233-7383
Daniel SanchezSchool of Forestry Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Crystal M HeppSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Jill CockingSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Colin SobekPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Nicole PagelSchool of Informatics, Computing, and Cyber Systems Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Faith WalkerPathogen and Microbiome Institute Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.
Carol L ChambersSchool of Forestry Northern Arizona University Flagstaff Arizona.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bats and their associated guano microbiota provide important terrestrial and subterranean ecosystem services and serve as a reservoir for a wide range of epizootic and zoonotic diseases. Unfortunately, large-scale studies of bats and their guano microbiotas are limited by the time and cost of sample collection, which requires specially trained individuals to work at night to capture bats when they are most active. Indirectly surveying bat gut microbiota through guano deposits could be a more cost-effective alternative, but it must first be established whether the postdefecation exposure to an aerobic environment has a large impact on the guano microbial community. A number of recent studies on mammalian feces have shown that the impact of aerobic exposure is highly species specific; therefore, it is difficult to predict how exposure will affect the bat guano microbiota without empirical data. In our study, we collected fresh guano samples from 24 individuals of 10 bat species that are common throughout the arid environments of the American southwest and subjected the samples to 0, 1, and 12 hr of exposure. The biodiversity decreased rapidly after the shift from an anaerobic to an aerobic environment-much faster than previously reported in mammalian species. However, the relative composition of the core guano microbiota remained stable and, using highly sensitive targeted PCR methods, we found that pathogens present in the original, non-exposed samples could still be recovered after 12 hr of exposure. These results suggest that with careful sample analysis protocols, a more efficient passive collection strategy is feasible; for example, guano could be collected on tarps placed near the roost entrance. Such passive collection methods would greatly reduce the cost of sample collection by allowing more sites or roosts to be surveyed with a fraction of trained personnel, time, and effort investments needed.

Indexed as

abiotic effectsbatsguano microbiotanoninvasive samplingpostdefecation

Identifiers

PMID29938074
PMCPMC6010783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.