Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937985›Full record

ArticleJournal of radiation oncology2018

Intraoperative radiation therapy as part of planned monotherapy for early-stage breast cancer.

Varun K Chowdhry, Julie A Bushey, Rebecca M Kwait, Saveli Goldberg, Jeannine Ritchie, Yong-Li Ji, Roderick McKee, Diane Palladino, Gary M Proulx

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of radiation oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Why should radiation oncology do translational research? [corrected].Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Varun K Chowdhry1Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.
Julie A Bushey2Department of Radiation Oncology, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, NH, USA.
Rebecca M Kwait3Core Physicians, Department of Surgery, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, NH, USA.
Saveli Goldberg1Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.
Jeannine Ritchie4Department of Pathology, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, NH, USA.
Yong-Li Ji5Division of Hematology/Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.
Roderick McKee3Core Physicians, Department of Surgery, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, NH, USA.
Diane Palladino3Core Physicians, Department of Surgery, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, NH, USA.
Gary M Proulx1Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA USA.
Exeter Hospital · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAdjuvant whole breast radiation therapy has developed into the standard of care for patients following a lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer. However, there is recent interest in intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) to minimize toxicity while still improving local control beyond surgical resection and anti-estrogen therapy alone. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients were evaluated pre-operatively in a multidisciplinary clinic setting at a community hospital for suitability for breast conservation therapy. A total of 109 patients were reviewed receiving 110 IORT treatments. Patients were followed with clinical breast examinations and mammography as clinically indicated.

resultsAt a median follow-up of 29.9 months, 2/110 (1.8%) patients experienced a local failure. One patient (0.9%) experienced a regional failure. Local control, disease-free survival and overall survival at 3 years were 98.9% (95%CI 92.2-99.8), 97.2% (95%CI 88.9-99.3), and 96.0% (95%CI 84.9-99.0), respectively. Five-year local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 96.3% (95%CI 84.7-99.2), 94.6% (95%CI 83.2-98.3), and 92.5% (95%CI 80.4-97.3), respectively. Patient self-reported cosmetic outcome was available for 51 patients, with all patients reporting being either very pleased, pleased, or satisfied with their cosmetic outcome, and no patients reported being dissatisfied or worse.

conclusionsThe results of our series suggest the feasibility of utilizing IORT in a community-based cancer center with a high degree of local control, and patient satisfaction with regard to cosmesis. While the results of this series suggest that IORT may be a promising modality, longer follow-up is warranted to better understand exactly which clinicopathological features can predict long-term locoregional disease control.

Indexed as

Early-stage breast cancerElectronic brachytherapyIntraoperative radiation therapy

Identifiers

PMID29937985
PMCPMC5978806
OpenAlexW2780922060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.