Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937946›Full record

ArticleNeuroethics2018

Ethics of Deep Brain Stimulation in Adolescent Patients with Refractory Tourette Syndrome: a Systematic Review and Two Case Discussions.

Anouk Y J M Smeets, A A Duits, D Horstkötter, C Verdellen, G de Wert, Y Temel, L Ackermans, A F G Leentjens

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroethics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Deep brain stimulation for Tourette's syndrome.Translational neurodegeneration · 2020
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Neuroethics of Neuromodulation: An Update.Current opinion in biomedical engineering · 2018
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Anouk Y J M Smeets1Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1795-1342
A A Duits2Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
D Horstkötter3Department of Health Ethics and Society, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
C VerdellenParnassia Group, PsyQ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
G de Wert6Department of Health Ethics and Society, Caphri Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Y Temel1Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
L Ackermans1Department of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
A F G Leentjens2Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NLParnassia Groep · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTourette Syndrome (TS) is a childhood onset disorder characterized by vocal and motor tics and often remits spontaneously during adolescence. For treatment refractory patients, Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) may be considered. METHODS AND

resultsWe discuss ethical problems encountered in two adolescent TS patients treated with DBS and systematically review the literature on the topic. Following surgery one patient experienced side effects without sufficient therapeutic effects and the stimulator was turned off. After a second series of behavioural treatment, he experienced a tic reduction of more than 50%. The second patient went through a period of behavioural disturbances that interfered with optimal programming, but eventually experienced a 70% tic reduction. Sixteen DBS surgeries in adolescent TS patients have been reported, none of which pays attention to ethical aspects. DISCUSSION: Specific ethical issues arise in adolescent TS patients undergoing DBS relating both to clinical practice as well as to research. Attention should be paid to selecting patients fairly, thorough examination and weighing of risks and benefits, protecting the health of children and adolescents receiving DBS, special issues concerning patient's autonomy, and the normative impact of quality of life. In research, registration of all TS cases in a central database covering a range of standardized information will facilitate further development of DBS for this indication.

conclusionClinical practice should be accompanied by ongoing ethical reflection, preferably covering not only theoretical thought but providing also insights in the views and perspectives of those concerned, that is patients, family members and professionals.

Indexed as

AdolescentsDeep brain stimulationEthicsTic disorderTourette syndrome

Identifiers

PMID29937946
PMCPMC5978799
OpenAlexW2790968523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.