Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937762›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2018

Microbial Interactions With Dissolved Organic Matter Drive Carbon Dynamics and Community Succession.

Xiaoqin Wu, Liyou Wu, Yina Liu, Ping Zhang, Qinghao Li, Jizhong Zhou, Nancy J Hess, Terry C Hazen, Wanli Yang, Romy Chakraborty

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
13.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 208 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaoqin WuEarth and Environmental Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Liyou WuInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Yina LiuEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Earth and Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Ping ZhangInstitute for Environmental Genomics, Department of Microbiology and Plant Biology, The University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, United States.
Qinghao LiAdvanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Jizhong ZhouEarth and Environmental Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Nancy J HessEnvironmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Earth and Biological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Terry C HazenDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville, Knoxville, TN, United States.
Wanli YangAdvanced Light Source, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Romy ChakrabortyEarth and Environmental Sciences, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USUniversity of Oklahoma · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USTexas A&M University · USUniversity of Tennessee at Knoxville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of dynamic interactions between natural organic matter (NOM) and microbial communities is critical not only to delineate the routes of NOM degradation/transformation and carbon (C) fluxes, but also to understand microbial community evolution and succession in ecosystems. Yet, these processes in subsurface environments are usually studied independently, and a comprehensive view has been elusive thus far. In this study, we fed sediment-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) to groundwater microbes and continually analyzed microbial transformation of DOM over a 50-day incubation. To document fine-scale changes in DOM chemistry, we applied high-resolution Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) and soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (sXAS). We also monitored the trajectory of microbial biomass, community structure and activity over this time period. Together, these analyses provided an unprecedented comprehensive view of interactions between sediment-derived DOM and indigenous subsurface groundwater microbes. Microbial decomposition of labile C in DOM was immediately evident from biomass increase and total organic carbon (TOC) decrease. The change of microbial composition was closely related to DOM turnover: microbial community in early stages of incubation was influenced by relatively labile tannin- and protein-like compounds; while in later stages the community composition evolved to be most correlated with less labile lipid- and lignin-like compounds. These changes in microbial community structure and function, coupled with the contribution of microbial products to DOM pool affected the further transformation of DOM, culminating in stark changes to DOM composition over time. Our study demonstrates a distinct response of microbial communities to biotransformation of DOM, which improves our understanding of coupled interactions between sediment-derived DOM, microbial processes, and community structure in subsurface groundwater.

Indexed as

dynamic interactionslabile carbonmicrobe-carbon interactionsmicrobial successionmolecular-level characterizationnatural organic matter (NOM)recalcitrant carbonsubsurface carbon cycling

Identifiers

PMID29937762
PMCPMC6002664
OpenAlexW2804258126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.