Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937712›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2018

Cortical Excitability and Interhemispheric Connectivity in Early Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Studied With TMS-EEG.

Carl M Zipser, Isabella Premoli, Paolo Belardinelli, Nazareth Castellanos, Davide Rivolta, Tonio Heidegger, Florian Müller-Dahlhaus, Ulf Ziemann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinical diagnostic utility of transcranial magnetic stimulation in neurological disorders. Updated report of an IFCN committee.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Carl M ZipserDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Isabella PremoliDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Paolo BelardinelliDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Nazareth CastellanosNirakara: Instituto de Investigación y Formación en Ciencias Cognitivas, Madrid, Spain.
Davide RivoltaDepartment of Education Science, Psychology and Communication Science, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Tonio HeideggerDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Florian Müller-DahlhausDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ulf ZiemannDepartment of Neurology and Stroke, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
University of Tübingen · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evoked potentials (EPs) are well established in clinical practice for diagnosis and prognosis in multiple sclerosis (MS). However, their value is limited to the assessment of their respective functional systems. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) coupled with electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) to investigate cortical excitability and spatiotemporal dynamics of TMS-evoked neural activity in MS patients. Thirteen patients with early relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) with a median Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 1.0 (range 0-2.5) and 16 age- and gender-matched healthy controls received single-pulse TMS of left and right primary motor cortex (L-M1 and R-M1), respectively. Resting motor threshold for L-M1 and R-M1 was increased in MS patients. Latencies and amplitudes of N45, P70, N100, P180, and N280 TMS-evoked EEG potentials (TEPs) were not different between groups, except a significantly increased amplitude of the N280 TEP in the MS group, both for L-M1 and R-M1 stimulation. Interhemispheric signal propagation (ISP), estimated from the area under the curve of TEPs in the non-stimulated vs. stimulated M1, also did not differ between groups. In summary, findings show that ISP and TEPs were preserved in early-stage RRMS, except for an exaggerated N280 amplitude. Our findings indicate that TMS-EEG is feasible in testing excitability and connectivity in cortical neural networks in MS patients, complementary to conventional EPs. However, relevance and pathophysiological correlates of the enhanced N280 will need further study.

Indexed as

connectivityexcitabilitymultiple sclerosisrelapsing–remittingTMS-EEGtranscranial magnetic stimulation

Identifiers

PMID29937712
PMCPMC6002497
OpenAlexW2804878018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.