Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937256›Full record

Trial reportBehavior therapy2018

Group CBT for Externalizing Disorders in Urban Schools: Effect of Training Strategy on Treatment Fidelity and Child Outcomes.

Ricardo Eiraldi, Jennifer A Mautone, Muniya S Khanna, Thomas J Power, Andrew Orapallo, Jaclyn Cacia, Billie S Schwartz, Barry McCurdy, Jacqueline Keiffer, Cynthia Paidipati and 7 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavior therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Ricardo EiraldiThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania. Electronic address: eiraldi@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Jennifer A MautoneThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Muniya S KhannaThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Thomas J PowerThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.
Andrew OrapalloThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Jaclyn CaciaThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Billie S SchwartzThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Barry McCurdyDevereux Center for Effective Schools.
Jacqueline KeifferUniversity of Virginia, Curry School of Education.
Cynthia PaidipatiSchool of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania.
Rebecca KanineThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Manju AbrahamThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Shelby TulioThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Lauren SwiftThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Shannon N BresslerThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Beatriz CabelloThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Abbas F JawadThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Targeting School Climate and Children?s Behavioral Health in Urban SchoolsR01HD073430 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI EIRALDI, RICARDO B · 2013 to 2017
$3.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073430
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Public schools are an ideal setting for the delivery of mental health services to children. Unfortunately, services provided in schools, and more so in urban schools, have been found to lead to little or no significant clinical improvements. Studies with urban school children seldom report on the effects of clinician training on treatment fidelity and child outcomes. This study examines the differential effects of two levels of school-based counselor training: training workshop with basic consultation (C) vs. training workshop plus enhanced consultation (C+) on treatment fidelity and child outcomes. Fourteen school staff members (counselors) were randomly assigned to C or C+. Counselors implemented a group cognitive behavioral therapy protocol (Coping Power Program, CPP) for children with or at risk for externalizing behavior disorders. Independent coders coded each CPP session for content and process fidelity. Changes in outcomes from pre to post were assessed via a parent psychiatric interview and interviewer-rated severity of illness and global impairment. Counselors in C+ delivered CPP with significantly higher levels of content and process fidelity compared to counselors in C. Both C and C+ resulted in significant improvement in interviewer-rated impairment; the conditions did not differ from each other with regard to impairment. Groups did not differ with regard to pre- to- posttreatment changes in diagnostic severity level. School-based behavioral health staff in urban schools are able to implement interventions with fidelity and clinical effectiveness when provided with ongoing consultation. Enhanced consultation resulted in higher fidelity. Enhanced consultation did not result in better student outcomes compared to basic consultation. Implications for resource allocation decisions with staff training in EBP are discussed.

Indexed as

School Health ServicesSchoolsUrban PopulationAdaptation, PsychologicalAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolCluster AnalysisCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesNeurodevelopmental DisordersReferral and ConsultationStudentsdissemination and implementationevidence-based practicefidelitytrainingurban schools

Identifiers

PMID29937256
PMCPMC6020147

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.