Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018
Personalised perioperative care by e-health after intermediate-grade abdominal surgery: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of a Digital Perioperative Support Solution for Colorectal Surgery: Compliance and Impact on Patients
Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Self-esteem in Hysterectomized Women: a Mixed-method Approach
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Digital Health Interventions and Patient Safety in Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JAMA network open · 2024Pooled it
- Mobile applications in gastrointestinal surgery: a systematic review.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Pooled it
- The effectiveness of physical activity interventions using activity trackers during or after inpatient care: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2022Pooled it
- Educating Patients by Providing Timely Information Using Smartphone and Tablet Apps: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Pooled it
- Integrated care programmes for sport and work participation, performance of physical activities and quality of life among orthopaedic surgery patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Electronic Health Self-Management Interventions for Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review of Quantitative and Qualitative Evidence.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Pooled it
- Process evaluation of an integrated personalized eHealth programme after total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty-Results of the multicenter ACTIVE randomized controlled trial.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026Trial
- Trial
- The Effectiveness of the Be Prepared mHealth App on Recovery of Physical Functioning After Major Elective Surgery: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Multidimensional expectations of radiotherapy among patients with cancer - A cross-sectional study (ExpectRT).Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Recovery Patterns: Longitudinal Cluster Analysis of Physical Function Following Abdominal Surgery.Annals of surgery · 2026Article
- Remote symptom monitoring with clinical alerts following lumpectomy: do alerts predict 30-day re-operation or re-admission rates?Breast cancer research and treatment · 2026Article
- Digital health interventions for perioperative patient-reported outcomes: a network meta-analysis.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus open abdominal hysterectomy for women with a benign gynaecological condition: the LAVA RCT.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Article
- Impact of a digital pre- and rehabilitation program on postoperative outcomes after pelvic gynecological surgery.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Patient-reported outcomes of gynaecological gender-affirming surgeries: A prospective cohort study.International journal of transgender health · 2026Article
- Drink lemonade! Implementation of drinking 2 h before elective orthopedic surgery to reduce prolonged fasting.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025Article
- A Systematic Review of Smartphone Applications That Address Patient Care in the Peri-Operative Period.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Perioperative Telemedicine Care in Hernia Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2025Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInstructing and guiding patients after surgery is essential for successful recovery. However, the time that health-care professionals can spend with their patients postoperatively has been reduced because of efficiency-driven, shortened hospital stays. We evaluated the effect of a personalised e-health-care programme on return to normal activities after surgery.
methodsA multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was done at seven teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18-75 years who were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia surgery, or laparoscopic adnexal surgery for a benign indication were recruited. An independent researcher randomly allocated participants to either the intervention or control group using computer-based randomisation lists, with stratification by sex, type of surgery, and hospital. Participants in the intervention group had access to a perioperative, personalised, e-health-care programme, which managed recovery expectations and provided postoperative guidance tailored to the patient. The control group received usual care and access to a placebo website containing standard general recovery advice. Participants were unaware of the study hypothesis and were asked to complete questionnaires at five timepoints during the 6-month period after surgery. The primary outcome was time between surgery and return to normal activities, measured using personalised patient-reported outcome measures. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial is registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4699.
findingsBetween Aug 24, 2015, and Aug 12, 2016, 344 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the intervention (n=173) or control (n=171) group. 14 participants (4%) were lost to follow-up, with 330 participants included in the primary outcome analysis. Median time until return to normal activities was 21 days (95% CI 17-25) in the intervention group and 26 days (20-32) in the control group (hazard ratio 1·38, 95% CI 1·09-1·73; p=0·007). Complications did not differ between groups.
interpretationA personalised e-health intervention after abdominal surgery speeds up the return to normal activities compared with usual care. Implementation of this e-health programme is recommended in patients undergoing intermediate-grade abdominal, gynaecological, or general surgical procedures.
fundingZonMw.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29937195What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.