Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937195›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018

Personalised perioperative care by e-health after intermediate-grade abdominal surgery: a multicentre, single-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

Eva van der Meij, Johannes R Anema, Wouter K G Leclercq, Marlies Y Bongers, Esther C J Consten, Steven E Schraffordt Koops, Peter M van de Ven, Caroline B Terwee, Johanna M van Dongen, Frederieke G Schaafsma and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04153721 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Digital Perioperative Support Solution for Colorectal Surgery: Compliance and Impact on Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorIHU StrasbourgRan2020 to 2023Enrolled22ConditionsColorectal CancerArmsName Digital Solution
NCT05373550 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effectiveness of a Nursing Educational Intervention on Quality of Life, Sexual Function, and Self-esteem in Hysterectomized Women: a Mixed-method Approach

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad de ConcepcionRan2021 to 2022Enrolled52ConditionsPrevention of Complications Due to HysterectomyArmsEffectiveness of a nursing educational intervention on quality of life, sexual function, and self-esteem in hysterectomized women: a mixed method approach.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Drink lemonade! Implementation of drinking 2 h before elective orthopedic surgery to reduce prolonged fasting.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Eva van der MeijDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Johannes R AnemaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Electronic address: h.anema@vumc.nl.
Wouter K G LeclercqDepartment of Surgery, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands.
Marlies Y BongersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven, Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University, Grow Research School, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Esther C J ConstenDepartment of Surgery, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands.
Steven E Schraffordt KoopsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Meander Medical Centre, Amersfoort, Netherlands.
Peter M van de VenDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Caroline B TerweeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Johanna M van DongenDepartment of Health Sciences, Amsterdam Public Health, Faculty of Science, VU University, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Frederieke G SchaafsmaDepartment of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Wilhelmus J H J MeijerinkDepartment of Operation Rooms, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Hendrik J BonjerDepartment of Surgery, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Judith A F HuirneDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInstructing and guiding patients after surgery is essential for successful recovery. However, the time that health-care professionals can spend with their patients postoperatively has been reduced because of efficiency-driven, shortened hospital stays. We evaluated the effect of a personalised e-health-care programme on return to normal activities after surgery.

methodsA multicentre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was done at seven teaching hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients aged 18-75 years who were scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy, inguinal hernia surgery, or laparoscopic adnexal surgery for a benign indication were recruited. An independent researcher randomly allocated participants to either the intervention or control group using computer-based randomisation lists, with stratification by sex, type of surgery, and hospital. Participants in the intervention group had access to a perioperative, personalised, e-health-care programme, which managed recovery expectations and provided postoperative guidance tailored to the patient. The control group received usual care and access to a placebo website containing standard general recovery advice. Participants were unaware of the study hypothesis and were asked to complete questionnaires at five timepoints during the 6-month period after surgery. The primary outcome was time between surgery and return to normal activities, measured using personalised patient-reported outcome measures. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were done. This trial is registered in the Netherlands National Trial Register, number NTR4699.

findingsBetween Aug 24, 2015, and Aug 12, 2016, 344 participants were enrolled and randomly allocated to either the intervention (n=173) or control (n=171) group. 14 participants (4%) were lost to follow-up, with 330 participants included in the primary outcome analysis. Median time until return to normal activities was 21 days (95% CI 17-25) in the intervention group and 26 days (20-32) in the control group (hazard ratio 1·38, 95% CI 1·09-1·73; p=0·007). Complications did not differ between groups.

interpretationA personalised e-health intervention after abdominal surgery speeds up the return to normal activities compared with usual care. Implementation of this e-health programme is recommended in patients undergoing intermediate-grade abdominal, gynaecological, or general surgical procedures.

fundingZonMw.

Indexed as

InternetAbdomenActivities of Daily LivingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPerioperative CarePrecision MedicineSingle-Blind MethodSurveys and QuestionnairesTelemedicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.