ArticleSurgical oncology2018
External validation of a modified 8th AJCC TNM system for advanced gastric cancer: Long-term results in southern China.
Article in Surgical oncology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Conversion therapy with sintilimab combined with chemotherapy and apatinib in stage IV gastric cancer.International journal of cancer · 2025Trial
- Complement C3 overexpression activates JAK2/STAT3 pathway and correlates with gastric cancer progression.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2020Trial
- Preoperative staging of gastric cancer: a prospective comparison of gastric filling ultrasonography and enhanced CT with implications for surgical decision-making.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- Spectral computed tomography-based quantitative parameters combined with extracellular volume fraction to predict lymph node metastases in gastric cancer.European radiology · 2025Article
- Unsupervised machine learning reveals prognostic value of dynamic carbohydrate antigen 125 trajectory in gastric cancer.BMC cancer · 2025Article
- Prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in pN0 stage gastric cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.BMC surgery · 2024Article
- Article
- An analysis of the relationship of triglyceride glucose index with gastric cancer prognosis: A retrospective study.Cancer medicine · 2024Article
- A comprehensive radiopathological nomogram for the prediction of pathological staging in gastric cancer using CT-derived and WSI-based features.Translational oncology · 2024Article
- Revisiting the 8th AJCC system for gastric cancer: A review on validations, nomograms, lymph nodes impact, and proposed modifications.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2022Review
- Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy.Annals of translational medicine · 2021Article
- The New American Joint Committee on Cancer T staging system for stomach: increased complexity without clear improvement in predictive accuracy for endoscopic ultrasound.BMC gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Multiple metabolic parameters and visual assessment ofAbdominal radiology (New York) · 2020Article
- Diffuse Reduction of Spleen Density Is an Independent Predictor of Post-Operative Outcomes After Curative Gastrectomy in Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Center Study.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram in gastric cancer with hepatitis B virus infection.Journal of translational medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- The comparison of clinicopathological characteristics of two distinct manifestations of gastric signet ring cell carcinoma under EUS.Endoscopic ultrasoundArticle
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging manual for gastric cancer (GC) has been validated by several studies. A modified staging system based on it and total harvested number of lymph nodes (LNs; cutoff: 30) is suggested to improve predictive capacities for advanced GC. This study is designed to validate the modified method using a single-center database in Southern China.
methodsClinical data from 684 GC patients with stage II and III according to the 7th edition between 2001 and 2012 were reviewed. A modified staging system was applied to restage the cohort. The three staging systems were compared in terms of prognostic performance on long-term survival.
resultsThe median follow-up period of this cohort was 52 (range, 6-180) months, with a median 5-year overall survival rate of 52.4%. Stage migration was observed in 159 (23.2%) patients according to the 8th edition of TNM staging, and another migration was observed in 108 (15.8%) patients according to the modified TNM staging system. Compared with the modified staging system, both 7th and 8th edition of AJCC TNM staging systems did not prove survival concordance on stage IIIA (7th edition) and stage IIIC (8th edition) when <30 LNs were examined. The survival performance between two AJCC staging systems had no significant improvement (c-index, 0.607 vs. 0.609), with the best prognostic stratification obtained using the modified staging method (c-index, 0.631).
conclusionsThe modified staging system on basis of the 8th AJCC classification and the number of harvested LNs could provide an optimal predictive capacities for advanced gastric cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
29937164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.