Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937146›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2018

Clonal Analysis Delineates Transcriptional Programs of Osteogenic and Adipogenic Lineages of Adult Mouse Skeletal Progenitors.

Maria Rostovskaya, Samantha Donsante, Benedetto Sacchetti, Dimitra Alexopoulou, Sylvia Klemroth, Andreas Dahl, Mara Riminucci, Paolo Bianco, Konstantinos Anastassiadis

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. AnFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. GsαBone research · 2022
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Long non-coding RNAeLife · 2020
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria RostovskayaStem Cell Engineering, BIOTEC, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: mr631@cam.ac.uk.
Samantha DonsanteDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Benedetto SacchettiDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Dimitra AlexopoulouNGS Facility, BIOTEC, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Sylvia KlemrothNGS Facility, BIOTEC, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Andreas DahlNGS Facility, BIOTEC, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
Mara RiminucciDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Paolo BiancoDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Konstantinos AnastassiadisStem Cell Engineering, BIOTEC, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: konstantinos.anastassiadis@tu-dresden.de.
TU Dresden · DESapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone, cartilage, and marrow adipocytes are generated by skeletal progenitors, but the relationships between lineages and mechanisms controlling their differentiation are poorly understood. We established mouse clonal skeletal progenitors with distinct differentiation properties and analyzed their transcriptome. Unipotent osteogenic and adipogenic cells expressed specific transcriptional programs, whereas bipotent clones combined expression of those genes and did not show a unique signature. We tested potential regulators of lineage commitment and found that in the presence of interferon-γ (IFNγ) adipogenic clones can be induced to osteogenesis and that their adipogenic capacity is inhibited. Analysis of IFNγ-regulated genes showed that lineage signatures and fate commitment of skeletal progenitors were controlled by EGR1 and EGR2. Knockdown experiments revealed that EGR1 is a positive regulator of the adipogenic transcriptional program and differentiation capacity, whereas EGR2 inhibits the osteogenic program and potency. Therefore, our work revealed transcriptional signatures of osteogenic and adipogenic lineages and mechanism triggering cell fate.

Indexed as

Transcription, GeneticAdipogenesisAnimalsBiomarkersCell DifferentiationClonal EvolutionEarly Growth Response Protein 1Early Growth Response Protein 2Gene Expression ProfilingMesenchymal Stem CellsMiceOsteogenesisReproducibility of ResultsSignal TransductionStem CellsStromal CellsBiomarkersEarly Growth Response Protein 1Early Growth Response Protein 2Egr1 protein, mouseEgr2 protein, mousebone marrow stromal cellsEgr1/2 transcription factorsinterferon-γ signalinglineage commitmentskeletal progenitorstranscriptional signatures

Identifiers

PMID29937146
PMCPMC6067065
OpenAlexW2809532866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.