Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29937006›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of surgical research2018

Development of murine bariatric surgery models: lessons learned.

Heather A Frohman, Piotr G Rychahou, Jing Li, Tong Gan, B Mark Evers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of surgical research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Heather A FrohmanDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Piotr G RychahouDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Jing LiMarkey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Tong GanDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
B Mark EversDepartment of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky; Markey Cancer Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Electronic address: mark.evers@uky.edu.
Markey Cancer Center · USUniversity of Kentucky · US

Funding

University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center Support Grant ECIA SupplementP30CA177558 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers · 2013 to 2026
$38.3M
Mechanisms Regulating Neurotensin Secretion and FunctionR01DK112034 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI EVERS, BERNARD MARK · 2017 to 2025
$4.9M
Oncology Research Training for Surgeon-ScientistsT32CA160003 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI Bernard Mark Evers, Pamela Carmen Hull · 2011 to 2026
$3.2M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA177558NCI NIH HHS T32 CA160003NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK112034
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) improves comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension and lowers the risk of obesity-related cancers. To better understand the physiologic and genetic influences of bariatric surgery, a reliable murine model is needed that can be extended to genetically engineered mice. Given the complexity of these procedures, few researchers have successfully implemented these techniques beyond larger rodent models. The purpose of our study was to develop a technically feasible and reproducible murine model for RYGB and sleeve gastrectomy (SG). Mice were converted to liquid diet perioperatively without fasting and housed in groups on raised wire platforms. SG involved significant reduction of stomach volume followed by multilayer repair of the gastrotomy. RYGB procedure consisted of side-to-side, functional end-to-side bowel anastomoses and exclusion of the stomach medial to the gastroesophageal junction. Sham surgeries consisted of enterotomies and gastrotomy followed by primary repair without resection or rerouting. Survival after incorporation of the aforementioned techniques was 100% in the SG group and 41% in the RYGB group at 1 mo after surgery. Only 26% of RYGB mortality was attributed to leak, obstruction, or stricture; the majority of postoperative mortality was due to stress, dumping, or malnutrition. Much of the survival challenge for this surgical model was related to perioperative husbandry, which is to be expected given their small stature and poor response to stress. Utilization of the perioperative and surgical techniques described will increase survival and feasibility of these technically challenging procedures, allowing for a better understanding of mechanisms to explain the beneficial effects of bariatric surgery.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsDiet, High-FatFemaleGastrectomyGastric BypassHumansIncidenceMiceObesity, MorbidPerioperative PeriodPostoperative ComplicationsSurvival AnalysisTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeBariatric surgeryMurine modelRoux-en-Y gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID29937006
PMCPMC6298430
OpenAlexW2801019145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.