Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29936668›Full record

ArticleThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2018

The clinical evaluation of the CADence device in the acoustic detection of coronary artery disease.

Joseph L Thomas, Michael Ridner, Jason H Cole, Jeffrey W Chambers, Sabahat Bokhari, Demetris Yannopoulos, Morton Kern, Robert F Wilson, Matthew J Budoff

Abstract readComparative StudyEquivalence TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coronary artery disease risk reclassification by a new acoustic-based score.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Joseph L ThomasLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA, Torrance, CA, USA. jthomas@labiomed.org.
Michael RidnerHeart Center Research, Huntsville, AL, USA.
Jason H ColeCardiology Associates, Mobile, AL, USA.
Jeffrey W ChambersMetropolitan Heart and Vascular Institute, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Sabahat BokhariColumbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Demetris YannopoulosUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Morton KernUniversity of California - Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Robert F WilsonUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Matthew J BudoffLos Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor UCLA, Torrance, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The noninvasive detection of turbulent coronary flow may enable diagnosis of significant coronary artery disease (CAD) using novel sensor and analytic technology. Eligible patients (n = 1013) with chest pain and CAD risk factors undergoing nuclear stress testing were studied using the CADence (AUM Cardiovascular Inc., Northfield MN) acoustic detection (AD) system. The trial was designed to demonstrate non-inferiority of AD for diagnostic accuracy in detecting significant CAD as compared to an objective performance criteria (sensitivity 83% and specificity 80%, with 15% non-inferiority margins) for nuclear stress testing. AD analysis was blinded to clinical, core lab-adjudicated angiographic, and nuclear data. The presence of significant CAD was determined by computed tomographic (CCTA) or invasive angiography. A total of 1013 subjects without prior coronary revascularization or Q-wave myocardial infarction were enrolled. Primary analysis was performed on subjects with complete angiographic and AD data (n = 763) including 111 subjects (15%) with severe CAD based on CCTA (n = 34) and invasive angiography (n = 77). The sensitivity and specificity of AD were 78% (p = 0.012 for non-inferiority) and 35% (p < 0.001 for failure to demonstrate non-inferiority), respectively. AD results had a high 91% negative predictive value for the presence of significant CAD. AD testing failed to demonstrate non-inferior diagnostic accuracy as compared to the historical performance of a nuclear stress OPC due to low specificity. AD sensitivity was non-inferior in detecting significant CAD with a high negative predictive value supporting a potential value in excluding CAD.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationAcousticsAgedCloud ComputingComputed Tomography AngiographyCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary StenosisCoronary VesselsDouble-Blind MethodEquipment DesignFemaleHeart Function TestsHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcoustic cardiographyCoronary artery diseaseCoronary stenosisMyocardial ischemia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.