Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29936577›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in neurology2018

Antiplatelet Agents in Secondary Stroke Prevention: Selection, Timing, and Dose.

Tarun Girotra, Forrest Lowe, Wuwei Feng, Bruce Ovbiagele

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in neurology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Who needs acetylsalicylic acid? Some order after many studies.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tarun GirotraDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Forrest LoweDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.
Wuwei FengDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA. feng@musc.edu.
Bruce OvbiageleDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review critically evaluated the published studies regarding the systematic use of antiplatelet agents for secondary stroke prevention. RECENT

findingsStroke is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality around the world. Multimodal prevention is the most viable strategy for reducing the societal burden of stroke recurrence. For secondary stroke prevention, antiplatelet therapy is at the core of effective long-term vascular risk reduction among survivors of an ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). In addition to aspirin, there are several antiplatelet agents proven to be efficacious in averting recurrent vascular events after an index ischemic stroke or TIA. However, beyond the challenges of keeping up with recent advances in antiplatelet drug options for secondary stroke prevention, questions linger about the most appropriate selection, timing, and dosing of antiplatelet treatment for a given patient. We narratively summarized the pharmacological properties of key antiplatelet drugs; discussed the evidence regarding efficacy, selection, timing, and dosing of various antiplatelet treatment regimens; and highlighted ongoing clinical trials identifying novel therapies with more favorable risk-benefit profiles than currently available antiplatelet agents for patients with a recent history of ischemic or TIA stroke. Finally, we reviewed published data on antiplatelet therapies that could potentially be applied in the management of commonly encountered challenging clinical scenarios.

Indexed as

AntiplateletDoseStroke preventionTiming

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.