Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29936549›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2018

Comparison of peak oxygen uptake and exercise efficiency between upper-body poling and arm crank ergometry in trained paraplegic and able-bodied participants.

Julia Kathrin Baumgart, Laura Gürtler, Gertjan Ettema, Øyvind Sandbakk

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia Kathrin BaumgartCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Smistadgrenda 11, 7026, Trondheim, Norway. jk.baumgart@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5628-6050
Laura GürtlerCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Smistadgrenda 11, 7026, Trondheim, Norway.
Gertjan EttemaCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Smistadgrenda 11, 7026, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3370-0957
Øyvind SandbakkCentre for Elite Sports Research, Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Smistadgrenda 11, 7026, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9014-5152
Norwegian University of Science and Technology · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare peak oxygen uptake (VO

methodsSeven PARA and eleven AB upper-body trained participants performed four 5-min submaximal stages, and an incremental test to exhaustion in UBP and ACE. VO

resultsVO

conclusionsIn upper-body-trained PARA and AB participants, VO

Indexed as

AdultArmEnergy MetabolismErgometryExerciseExercise TestFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOxygenOxygen ConsumptionParaplegiaYoung AdultOxygenAerobic powerEnduranceParalympicSpinal cord injuryVO2maxVO2peak

Identifiers

PMID29936549
PMCPMC6105255
OpenAlexW2809869742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.