Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29936452›Full record

ArticleIn vivo (Athens, Greece)

Expression of p16 and SATB1 in Invasive Ductal Breast Cancer - A Preliminary Study.

Christopher Kobierzycki, Jedrzej Grzegrzolka, Natalia Glatzel-Plucinska, Aleksandra Piotrowska, Andrzej Wojnar, Beata Smolarz, Hanna Romanowicz, Piotr Dziegiel

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in In vivo (Athens, Greece). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Role of SATB1 in Tumour Progression and Metastasis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher KobierzyckiDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland christopher.kobierzycki@umed.wroc.pl.
Jedrzej GrzegrzolkaDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Natalia Glatzel-PlucinskaDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Aleksandra PiotrowskaDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Andrzej WojnarDepartment of Pathomorphology, Lower Silesian Oncology Centre, Wroclaw, Poland.
Beata SmolarzDepartment of Pathology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Hanna RomanowiczDepartment of Pathology, Polish Mother's Memorial Hospital Research Institute, Lodz, Poland.
Piotr DziegielDivision of Histology and Embryology, Department of Human Morphology and Embryology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.
Wroclaw Medical University · PLPolish Mother’s Memorial Hospital Research Institute · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimAn impaired cell-cycle control and genetic material organization are crucial elements of carcinogenesis. p16 is a tumor suppressor protein which decelerates promotion of the cells from G MATERIALS AND

methodsThe study was performed on 130 samples of archived invasive ductal breast cancers. Immunohistochemical reactions were performed on freshly prepared tissue microarrays and subsequently scanned by a histologic scanner. Reactions were evaluated separately in the cytoplasm (p16c, SATB1c) and nucleus (p16n, SATB1n, Ki-67) with use of a quantification software under researcher supervision.

resultsExpression was observed for Ki-67 in 100%, p16c in 90%, p16n in 89.2%, SATB1c in 98.5% and SATB1n in 87.7% of cancer cases. Statistical analysis showed strong positive correlations: p16c vs. p16n and SATB1c vs. SATB1n (p<0.001 for both) and weak positive correlations: p16c vs. SATB1c and p16c vs. SATB1n (p=0.008, p=0.027; respectively). Expression of p16n was stronger in G

conclusionA weak association between immunohistochemical expression of p16 and SATB1 indicated limited possibility of their independent usage. Further studies concerning determination of a wider panel of proteins controlling cell cycle should be considered.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCell CycleCell NucleusCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16CytoplasmFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansKi-67 AntigenMatrix Attachment Region Binding ProteinsMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingBiomarkers, TumorCDKN2A protein, humanCyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16Ki-67 AntigenMatrix Attachment Region Binding ProteinsReceptors, ProgesteroneSATB1 protein, humanbreast cancerKi-67p16proliferationSATB1tissue microarrayTMA

Identifiers

PMID29936452
PMCPMC6117790
OpenAlexW2811269946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.