Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29936432›Full record

SynthesisBritish journal of sports medicine2018

Treatment after traumatic shoulder dislocation: a systematic review with a network meta-analysis.

Lauri Kavaja, Tuomas Lähdeoja, Antti Malmivaara, Mika Paavola

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in British journal of sports medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic Review of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Outcomes for Anterior Shoulder Instability.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Management of first-time shoulder dislocations: A survey of sport medicine physician perceptions.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Off-track Hill-Sachs lesions predispose to recurrence after nonoperative management of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Article
  20. Maximal Medical Improvement Following Shoulder Stabilization Surgery May Require up to 1 Year: A Systematic Review.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauri Kavaja *Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomas Lähdeoja *Medical Faculty, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.
Antti MalmivaaraCentre for Health and Social Economics, Institute of Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland.
Mika PaavolaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Töölö Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Töölö Hospital · FIInvalidisäätiö · FIUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo review and compare treatments (1) after primary traumatic shoulder dislocation aimed at minimising the risk of chronic shoulder instability and (2) for chronic post-traumatic shoulder instability.

designIntervention systematic review with random effects network meta-analysis and direct comparison meta-analyses. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (Ovid MEDLINE, Cochrane Clinical Trials Register, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, DARE, HTA, NHSEED, Web of Science) and reference lists were searched from inception to 15 January 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Randomised trials comparing any interventions either after a first-time, traumatic shoulder dislocation or chronic post-traumatic shoulder instability, with a shoulder instability, function or quality of life outcome.

resultsTwenty-two randomised controlled trials were included. There was moderate quality evidence suggesting that labrum repair reduced the risk of future shoulder dislocation (relative risk 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.8, p=0.026), and that with non-surgical management 47% of patients did not experience shoulder redislocation. Very low to low-quality evidence suggested no benefit of immobilisation in external rotation versus internal rotation. There was low-quality evidence that an open procedure was superior to arthroscopic surgery for preventing shoulder redislocations.

conclusionsThere was moderate-quality evidence that half of the patients managed with physiotherapy after a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation did not experience recurrent shoulder dislocations. If chronic instability develops, surgery could be considered. There was no evidence regarding the effectiveness of surgical management for post-traumatic chronic shoulder instability.

Indexed as

HumansJoint InstabilityRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicShoulder Dislocationmeta-analysisshoulder

Identifiers

PMID29936432
PMCPMC6241619
OpenAlexW2810790785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.