Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29935600›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of anaesthesia2018

A stochastic basis for neural inertia in emergence from general anaesthesia.

A Proekt, A E Hudson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of anaesthesia, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neural Inertia: A Sticky Situation for Anesthesia.Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A ProektDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: proekt@gmail.com.
A E HudsonDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

Neurophysiological Mechanisms of Recovery of ConsciousnessR01GM124023 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI PROEKT, ALEXANDER · 2018 to 2022
$1.8M
Network perturbations: specificity of general anesthetic actions on interneuron subpopulationsK08GM121961 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI HUDSON, ANDREW · 2016 to 2019
$771k
Neurophysiological Basis of General AnesthesiaK08GM106144 · NIGMS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI PROEKT, ALEXANDER · 2013 to 2016
$739k
NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM106144NIGMS NIH HHS K08 GM121961NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM124023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransitions into and out of the anaesthetised state exhibit resistance to state transitions known as neural inertia. As a consequence, emergence from anaesthesia occurs at a consistently lower anaesthetic concentration than induction. Motivated by stochastic switching between discrete activity patterns observed at constant anaesthetic concentration, we investigated the consequences of such switching for neural inertia.

methodsWe simulated stochastic switching in MATLAB as Brownian motion on an energy landscape or equivalently as a discrete Markov process. Effects of anaesthetics were modelled as changing stability of the awake and the anaesthetised states. Simulation results were compared with re-analysed neural inertia data from mice and Drosophila.

resultsDiffusion on a two-well energy landscape gives rise to hysteresis. With additive noise, hysteresis collapses. This collapse occurs over a mixing time that is independent from pharmacokinetics. The two-well potential gives rise to the leftward shift for the emergence dose-response curve. Yet, from in vivo data, ΔEC

conclusionsStochastic state switching accounts for all known features of neural inertia. More than two states are required to explain the consistent increase observed in variability of recovery from general anaesthesia. This model predicts that hysteresis should collapse with a time scale independent of anaesthetic drug pharmacokinetics.

Indexed as

Anesthesia, GeneralAnesthesia Recovery PeriodStochastic ProcessesAlgorithmsAnestheticsComputer SimulationElectroencephalographyHumansMarkov ChainsModels, TheoreticalNervous System Physiological PhenomenaAnestheticsanaesthesia, generalconsciousness, loss of

Identifiers

PMID29935600
PMCPMC6200107
OpenAlexW2797540792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.