Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29935538›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2018

Do general practice patients with and without appointment differ? Cross-sectional study.

Bernhard Riedl, Simon Kehrer, Christoph U Werner, Antonius Schneider, Klaus Linde

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bernhard RiedlTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.
Simon KehrerTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.
Christoph U WernerTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.
Antonius SchneiderTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany.
Klaus LindeTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Medicine, Institute of General Practice, Orleansstrasse 47, 81667, Munich, Germany. klaus.linde@mri.tum.de.ORCID 0000-0002-2902-970X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEven in practices with a comprehensive appointment system a minority of patients walks in without prior notice, sometimes causing problems for practice service quality. We aimed to explore differences between patients consulting primary care practices with and without appointment.

methodsConsecutive patients visiting five primary care practices without an appointment and following patients with an appointment were asked to fill in a four-page questionnaire addressing socio-demographic characteristics, the reason for encounter, urgency of seeing a physician, depressive, somatic and anxiety symptoms, personality traits, and satisfaction with the practice. Physicians also documented the reason for encounter and assessed the urgency. Data were analyzed using univariate and multivariate methods.

resultsTwo hundred fifty-one patients without and 250 patients with appointment participated. Patients without appointment were significantly younger (mean age 44 vs. 50 years) and reported less often chronic diseases (29% vs. 45%). Also, reasons for encounter differed (e.g., 27% vs. 16% with a respiratory problem). Patients' ratings of urgency did not differ between groups (p = 0.46), but physicians rated urgency higher among patients without appointment (p < 0.001). In logistic regression analyses younger age, male gender, absence of chronic disease, positive screening for at least one mental disorder, low values on the personality trait openness for experience, a high urgency rating by the physician, and a respiratory or musculoskeletal problem as reason for encounter were significantly associated with a higher likelihood of being a patient without appointment.

conclusionsIn this study, younger age and a high urgency rating by physicians were the variables most consistently associated with the likelihood of being a patient without appointment. Overall, differences between patients seeking general practices with a comprehensive appointment system without prior notice and patients with appointments were relatively minor.

Indexed as

Appointments and SchedulesGeneral PracticeOffice VisitsAdultAgedAge FactorsChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal DiseasesMental disordersOrganizationPrimary careWaiting timesWalk-in patients

Identifiers

PMID29935538
PMCPMC6015657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.