ArticleBiomaterials2018
Correlating quantitative tumor accumulation and gene knockdown using SPECT/CT and bioluminescence imaging within an orthotopic ovarian cancer model.
Article in Biomaterials, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- The polymeric nanovectors landscape for cancer immunotherapies towards advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs).Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Folate-Functionalized Nanoparticle Drug Delivery Systems-Effectiveness and Concerns.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Article
- Engineering poly- and micelleplexes for nucleic acid delivery - A reflection on their endosomal escape.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023Review
- RNA Drug Delivery Using Biogenic Nanovehicles for Cancer Therapy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- Image-guided mathematical modeling for pharmacological evaluation of nanomaterials and monoclonal antibodies.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2020Review
- Strategies for Delivery of siRNAs to Ovarian Cancer Cells.Pharmaceutics · 2019Review
- Polymeric Nanoparticles in Gene Therapy: New Avenues of Design and Optimization for Delivery Applications.Polymers · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Using an orthotopic model of ovarian cancer, we studied the delivery of siRNA in nanoparticles of tri-block copolymers consisting of hyperbranched polyethylenimine-graft-polycaprolactone-block-poly(ethylene glycol) (hyPEI-g-PCL-b-PEG) with and without a folic acid targeting ligand. A SKOV-3/LUC FRα overexpressing cell line was employed to mimic the clinical manifestations of ovarian cancer. Both targeted and non-targeted micelleplexes were able to effectively deliver siRNA to the primary tumor and its metastases, as measured by gamma scintillation counting and confocal microscopy. Stability of the micelleplexes was demonstrated with a serum albumin binding study. Regarding biodistribution, intravenous (I.V.) administration showed a slight advantage of FRα targeted over non-targeted micelleplex accumulation within the tumor. However, both formulations displayed significant liver uptake. On the other hand, intraperitoneally (I.P.) injected mice showed a modest 6% of the injected dose per gram (ID/g) uptake within the primary and most interestingly also in the metastatic lesions which subsequently resulted in a 62% knockdown of firefly luciferase expression in the tumor after a single injection. While this is, to the best of our knowledge, the first paper that correlates quantitative tumor accumulation in an orthotopic tumor model with in vivo gene silencing, these data demonstrate that PEI-g-PCL-b-PEG-Fol conjugates are a promising option for gene knockdown in ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.