Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29935294›Full record

ReviewExperimental gerontology2018

The effects of donor age on organ transplants: A review and implications for aging research.

Jose Carlos Dayoub, Franco Cortese, Andreja Anžič, Tjaša Grum, João Pedro de Magalhães

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental gerontology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Transplanted hearts assimilate the recipient's biological age.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Integrating senotherapeutics into transplantation: liver reconditioning in an aging donor pool.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2026
    Review
  6. Liver, ageing and disease.Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Airway epithelium in lung transplantation: a potential actor for post-transplant complications?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Cellular Senescence and Frailty in Transplantation.Current transplantation reports · 2023
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jose Carlos DayoubIntegrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Room 281, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, United Kingdom.
Franco CorteseBiogerontology Research Foundation, Research Department, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Andreja AnžičIntegrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Room 281, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, United Kingdom.
Tjaša GrumIntegrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Room 281, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, United Kingdom.
João Pedro de MagalhãesIntegrative Genomics of Ageing Group, Institute of Ageing and Chronic Disease, University of Liverpool, William Henry Duncan Building, Room 281, 6 West Derby Street, Liverpool L7 8TX, United Kingdom; Biogerontology Research Foundation, Research Department, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: jp@senescence.info.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 104978/Z/14/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the considerable amount of data available on the effect of donor age upon the outcomes of organ transplantation, these still represent an underutilized resource in aging research. In this review, we have compiled relevant studies that analyze the effect of donor age in graft and patient survival following liver, kidney, pancreas, heart, lung and cornea transplantation, with the aim of deriving insights into possible differential aging rates between the different organs. Overall, older donor age is associated with worse outcomes for all the organs studied. Nonetheless, the donor age from which the negative effects upon graft or patient survival starts to be significant varies between organs. In kidney transplantation, this age is within the third decade of life while the data for heart transplantation suggest a significant effect starting from donors over age 40. This threshold was less defined in liver transplantation where it ranges between 30 and 50 years. The results for the pancreas are also suggestive of a detrimental effect starting at a donor age of around 40, although these are mainly derived from simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation data. In lung transplantation, a clear effect was only seen for donors over 65, with negative effects of donor age upon transplantation outcomes likely beginning after age 50. Corneal transplants appear to be less affected by donor age as the majority of studies were unable to find any effect of donor age during the first few years posttransplantation. Overall, patterns of the effect of donor age in patient and graft survival were observed for several organ types and placed in the context of knowledge on aging.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAgingOrgan TransplantationTissue DonorsGraft SurvivalHumansBiogerontologyGeroscienceGraft survivalOrgan transplantationSenescence

Identifiers

PMID29935294
PMCPMC6123500

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.