Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29935213›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2018

Quality of Life of Caregivers of Hematopoietic Cell Transplant Recipients.

Kareem Jamani, Lynn E Onstad, Merav Bar, Paul A Carpenter, Elizabeth F Krakow, Rachel B Salit, Mary E D Flowers, Stephanie J Lee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Caring spouses under hematopoietic stem cell transplant based on Meleis' transition theory: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Family caregivers' support needs during allo-HSCT-a longitudinal study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kareem JamaniClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. Electronic address: kareem.jamani@ahs.ca.
Lynn E OnstadClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Merav BarClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Paul A CarpenterClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Elizabeth F KrakowClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Rachel B SalitClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Mary E D FlowersClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Stephanie J LeeClinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · US

Funding

VIRUS-MEDIATED MYELOSUPPRESSIONP01CA018029 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI STEPHANIE J LEE · 1985 to 2026
$128.4M
Improving Outcomes Assessment in Chronic GVHDR01CA118953 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEE, STEPHANIE J · 2011 to 2025
$8.3M
Improving Outcomes Assessment in Chronic GVHDU01CA118953 · NCI · FRED HUTCHINSON CANCER RESEARCH CENTER · PI LEE, STEPHANIE J · 2007 to 2010
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA018029NCI NIH HHS R01 CA118953NCI NIH HHS U01 CA118953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Caregivers are critical to recipient recovery after hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT); however, little is known about their long-term health and quality of life (QoL). In this study we surveyed 4446 caregiver-recipient pairs in the post-HCT period to describe their QoL and its determinants. In total, 849 caregiver-recipient pairs at a median of 6 years after autologous or allogeneic HCT responded. Among 849 responding caregivers at a median of 6 years post-HCT, 67% of caregivers were women and 68% indicated they were still providing care to the recipient. Mean and median QoL measures of caregivers were at or above general population norms; however, approximately 20% of caregivers reported poor QoL relative to general population norms. Multivariate analysis revealed that caregiver characteristics, including age, gender, and educational attainment, were important determinants of caregiver QoL. Additional determinants of caregiver QoL included recipient QoL, relapse after autologous HCT, and ongoing use of immunosuppression after allogeneic HCT. Additionally, the prevalence of depression and sleep disorders appear to be higher in caregivers than in the general population. We have identified a population of caregivers who may benefit from interventions aimed at improving QoL and health outcomes. HCT clinical practice should also consider caregiver well-being.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTransplantation ConditioningYoung AdultCaregiverFamily caregiverHematopoietic cell transplantInformal caregiverQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID29935213
PMCPMC6242735
OpenAlexW2808947392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.