Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29935172›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of pharmacology2018

Nutraceuticals in colorectal cancer: A mechanistic approach.

Marco Rossi, S E Y E D Sina Mirbagheri, Ali Keshavarzian, Faraz Bishehsari

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Interaction of the Gut Microbiome With Cancer Treatment.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. The Role of Probiotics in Colorectal Cancer Management.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marco RossiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
S E Y E D Sina MirbagheriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Ali KeshavarzianDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA.
Faraz BishehsariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive Diseases, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. Electronic address: faraz_bishehsari@rush.edu.
Rush University Medical Center · US

Funding

Brain-gut circadian rhythm interactions in alcohol-induced gut leakinessR01AA020216 · NIAAA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KESHAVARZIAN, ALI, TUREK, FRED W · 2010 to 2014
$3.0M
Role of Alcohol and Circadian Disruption in Inflammation and Colon CancerR01AA023417 · NIAAA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KESHAVARZIAN, ALI, KHAZAIE, KHASHAYARSHA · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
Abnormal Food Timing and Circadian Dyssynchrony in Alcohol Induced Colon CarcinogenesisK23AA025387 · NIAAA · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BISHEHSARI, FARAZ · 2018 to 2022
$945k
NIAAA NIH HHS K23 AA025387NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA020216NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most diagnosed cancers in the world. Even though screening, surgery and oncology have greatly advanced, CRC is still one of the leading causes of cancer deaths, with 700,000 annual mortalities in both men and women. Environmental and lifestyle factors brought up by industrialization, such as an altered diet, lack of physical activity, increase in alcohol consumption, and circadian disruption, have greatly affected the burden of CRC. These factors increase the CRC risk, at least partly, by pathologically altering the colonic environment, including composition of the gut microbiota, referred to as dysbiosis. Colonic dysbiosis can promote pro-carcinogenic immune signaling cascades, leading to pro-tumorigenic inflammation, carcinogen production, and altered cellular responses in susceptible host resulting to development and/or progression of CRC. Nutraceuticals such as prebiotic molecules and probiotic bacterial species can help maintain intestinal microbial homeostasis and thus mitigate this pathological processes. Therefore, prebiotics and probiotics can hinder the effects of dysbiosis by encouraging anti-carcinogenic, anti-inflammatory immunity, the maintenance of the intestinal epithelial barrier, pro-apoptotic mechanisms, and carcinogen inactivation. In addition to its implications in preventing CRC, because of the mechanisms affected, nutraceuticals are being discovered as potential adjuncts to immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of CRC. In this review, we provide an overview of the potential implications of prebiotics and probiotics in the prevention and treatment of CRC.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinogenesisColonColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyCostimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell ReceptorsDysbiosisGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansIncidencePrebioticsProbioticsTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCostimulatory and Inhibitory T-Cell ReceptorsPrebioticsImmunityMechanismNutraceuticalPrebioticProbioticTreatment

Identifiers

PMID29935172
PMCPMC6063737
OpenAlexW2809106382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.