Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934926›Full record

ArticleMaternal and child health journal2018

Vulnerable Women's Perceptions of Individual Versus Group Prenatal Care: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Erin Hetherington, Suzanne Tough, Deborah McNeil, Hamideh Bayrampour, Amy Metcalfe

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal and child health journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Erin HetheringtonDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. elhether@ucalgary.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9749-1955
Suzanne ToughDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Deborah McNeilDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Hamideh BayrampourDepartment of Family Practice, Midwifery Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
Amy MetcalfeDepartment of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
University of Calgary · CAAlberta Health Services · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Vulnerable pregnant women (e.g. women with low socio-economic status or recent immigrants) are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care or to attend perinatal education classes. CenteringPregnancy (CP) is a model of group prenatal care which combines assessment, education and support. This study aimed to assess patient experience among vulnerable women in group prenatal care compared to individual care. Methods Women participating in CP at a community-based health centre in urban Alberta were eligible to participate. A convenience sample of women who received individual care at a low-risk maternity clinic served as comparison. Women were asked a series of questions on their prenatal care experience. Demographic and patient responses were compared using Chi square, fisher's exact and t tests. Results Forty-five women accessing CP and 92 women accessing individual care participated. Women in CP were younger, more likely to be single and having their first baby than women in individual care. Women in CP were significantly more likely to report having received enough information on exercise during pregnancy (92 vs. 66%, p = 0.002), breastfeeding (95 vs. 70%, p = 0.002) and baby care (95 vs. 67%, p = 0.001). Women in CP were more likely to report that they felt their prenatal care providers were interested in how the pregnancy was affecting their life (100 vs. 93%, p ≤ 0.001). Discussion Group prenatal care provides a positive experience and improved information exchange among vulnerable populations. Programs interested in engaging, educating and empowering vulnerable pregnant women may benefit from implementation of group care.

Indexed as

Group ProcessesOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CarePatient Acceptance of Health CarePatient SatisfactionVulnerable PopulationsAdultAlbertaCanadaCommunity Health CentersCross-Sectional StudiesEmigrants and ImmigrantsFemaleHealth BehaviorHealth Care SurveysHumansPregnancyCenteringPregnancyPatient experiencePrenatal careVulnerable women

Identifiers

PMID29934926
OpenAlexW2808751596

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.