ArticleNeurosurgical review2019
Pain medication at ictus of subarachnoid hemorrhage-the influence of one-time acetylsalicylic acid usage on bleeding pattern, treatment course, and outcome: a matched pair analysis.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) is a well-known and widely used analgesic for acute pain. Patients with acute headache due to subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) are inclined to take ASA in this situation. Due to the antithrombotic effects, ASA intake is related to higher bleeding rates in case of hemorrhage or surgical treatment. Between January 2006 and December 2016, 941 patients without continuous antithrombotic or anticoagulant medication were treated due to SAH in our institution. Fourteen of them (1.5%) had taken ASA as a single dose because of headache within 24 h before hospital admission. A matched pair analysis was performed. Admission status was good in 93% of patients with one-time use of ASA (OTA), but only in 59% of all other patients (p < 0.01). Bleeding pattern did not differ, but half of the patients with OTA had no identifiable bleeding source; this rate was significantly lower in the rest of the patients (p < 0.005). Aneurysm treatment and related complications did not differ between both groups. Cerebral vasospasm was more often only mild and rates of cerebral infarctions were lower in the OTA group but not on a significant level. Eighty-six percent of the OTA group and 84% (p = 0.8) of the matched pair control group reached favorable outcome according to mRS 6 months after SAH. Patients with OTA in case of SAH are usually in good clinical condition and bleeding pattern does not differ. In half of the patients with OTA, no bleeding source was detectable. In the case of aneurysm treatment, related complications did not differ and most of the patients reached favorable outcome. In the case of aneurysm treatment procedure, OTA does not influence treatment course and should not influence treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.