Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934849›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2018

Adequate, questionable, and inadequate drug prescribing for older adults at the end of life: a European expert consensus.

Lucas Morin, Marie-Laure Laroche, Davide L Vetrano, Johan Fastbom, Kristina Johnell

Registry-linked trialAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04142645 (Pilot Study of the OptiMEDs Intervention), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04142645 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Pilot Study of the OptiMEDs Intervention: a Complex Intervention for Multidisciplinary Medication Review (Including Nurses, Pharmacists, and Physicians) in Nursing Homes, With ICT-support for the Evaluation of the Appropriateness of Prescribing and for Side-effect Monitoring

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity GhentRan2019 to 2020Enrolled148ConditionsMedication Review, Nursing Home Resident, Nursing HomeArmsOptiMEDs
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Deprescribing in Palliative Cancer Care.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lucas MorinAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden. lucas.morin@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8486-8610
Marie-Laure LarocheCentre de pharmacovigilance et de pharmaco-épidémiologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Limoges, France.
Davide L VetranoAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Johan FastbomAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.
Kristina JohnellAging Research Center, Karolinska Institutet, Tomtebodavägen 18A, 171 77, Stockholm, Sweden.

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd 2014-4699
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical guidance is needed to initiate, continue, and discontinue drug treatments near the end of life.

aimTo identify drugs and drug classes most often adequate, questionable, or inadequate for older people at the end of life.

designDelphi consensus survey. SETTING/

participantsForty European experts in geriatrics, clinical pharmacology, and palliative medicine from 10 different countries. Panelists were asked to characterize drug classes as "often adequate," "questionable," or "often inadequate" for use in older adults aged 75 years or older with an estimated life expectancy of ≤ 3 months. We distinguished the continuation of a drug class that was previously prescribed from the initiation of a new drug. Consensus was considered achieved for a given drug or drug class if the level of agreement was ≥ 75%.

resultsThe expert panel reached consensus on a set of 14 drug classes deemed as "often adequate," 28 drug classes deemed "questionable," and 10 drug classes deemed "often inadequate" for continuation during the last 3 months of life. Regarding the initiation of new drug treatments, the panel reached consensus on a set of 10 drug classes deemed "often adequate," 23 drug classes deemed "questionable," and 23 drug classes deemed "often inadequate". Consensus remained unachieved for some very commonly prescribed drug treatments (e.g., proton-pump inhibitors, furosemide, haloperidol, olanzapine, zopiclone, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors).

conclusionIn the absence of high-quality evidence from randomized clinical trials, these consensus-based criteria provide guidance to rationalize drug prescribing for older adults near the end of life.

Indexed as

Potentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansInappropriate PrescribingPractice Patterns, Physicians'Prescription DrugsSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CarePrescription DrugsDrug prescribingInappropriate prescribingOlder adultsPalliative careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID29934849
PMCPMC6132505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.