ArticleHNO2018
[Peripheral blood cell count and inflammation-based markers in chronic rhinosinusitis].
Article in HNO, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Changes in leukocytes and CRP in different treatments of major depression.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Article
- Immune Clues to Sinus Blues: Linking Biomarkers to Radiologic Score of Rhinosinusitis.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2026Article
- A prospective cohort study on the association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios and gestational diabetes mellitus in Chinese pregnant women.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio might predict the response to dupilumab treatment for patients with nasal polyposis.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of this study was to verify whether the following peripheral blood cell count and inflammation-based markers differ between various types of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS): neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), as well as erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C‑reactive protein (CRP) levels. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn all, 386 patients had complete peripheral blood count, ESR, CRP and nasal cytology. The severity of CRS symptoms was assessed using three-stage Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores. The participants were stratified based on the results of nasal cytology and by the presence of nasal polyps (NP). The inflammation-based markers were calculated by dividing the cell numbers of the different cell types by numbers of the other cell types. RESULTS AND
conclusionsBlood leukocyte and neutrophil counts were higher in neutrophilic CRS. Differences between patients with CRS with nasal polyps (NP) and CRS without NP were significant for blood leukocytes, neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, CRP, NLR and MLR values. In CRS with NP, peripheral blood leukocyte, neutrophil, monocyte and eosinophil counts, as well as CRP, NLR and MLR values were higher than in CRS without NP. Our results show that all individuals with CRS could benefit from the analysis of blood counts and inflammation-based markers at the beginning of their evaluation. High levels of inflammation-based markers might guide the clinician towards planning more radical CRS therapy and use of systemic anti-inflammatory medication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.