Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934843›Full record

ReviewDer Radiologe2018

[Entrapment and non-entrapment syndromes at the elbow].

T Godel, M Pham

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Radiologe, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 94% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T GodelAbteilung für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland. tim.godel@med.uni-heidelberg.de.
M PhamAbteilung für Neuroradiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Deutschland.
Heidelberg University · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueEntrapment syndromes of peripheral nerves at the elbow are common and are often diagnostically challenging disorders. Difficulties consist in lesion localization and recognition of complex spatial lesion patterns as well as in differentiation of focal and multifocal disorders. STANDARD DIAGNOSTIC

methodsMedical history taking, neurological examination and neurophysiological tests represent the gold standard in the diagnosis of peripheral nerve lesions at the elbow, but have known methodical limitations. METHODICAL INNOVATIONS: Additional diagnostic imaging tools recently developed for high-resolution visualization of extended peripheral nerve segments include 3 T magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) and neurosonography. PERFORMANCE: MRN and neurosonography can directly visualize and thus precisely localize focal and nonfocal peripheral nerve lesions of various origins with high spatial resolution at the anatomical level of nerve fascicles. ACHIEVEMENTS: MRN can cover peripheral nerve structures at the elbow, evaluate spatial nerve lesion patterns and partly disclose underlying causes. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Imaging of peripheral nerves is a valuable addition in the diagnostic work-up of entrapment syndromes at the elbow and provides important assistance in the differentiation of nonfocal differential diagnoses, especially in cases that cannot be clarified using standard diagnostic methods. The evaluation of spatial nerve lesion pattern may give additional information on the origin of the underlying disease, which is essential for further treatment.

Indexed as

Nerve Compression SyndromesElbowHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPeripheral NervesMagnetic resonance imagingMagnetic resonance neurographyNerve imagingPeripheral nervous systemPeripheral neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID29934843
OpenAlexW2809420651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.