Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934799›Full record

Trial reportClinical oral investigations2019

Does the skin color of patients influence the treatment decision-making of dentists? A randomized questionnaire-based study.

Luiz Alexandre Chisini, Thaís Gioda Noronha, Ezequiel Caruccio Ramos, Reginaldo Batista Dos Santos-Junior, Kaio Heide Sampaio, André Luis Faria-E-Silva, Marcos Britto Corrêa

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical oral investigations, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Tooth loss and rehabilitation in the elderly: an intersectional analysis of gender, race, and territory.Revista brasileira de epidemiologia = Brazilian journal of epidemiology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luiz Alexandre ChisiniFederal University of Pelotas, 457, Gonçalves Chaves St. 5th floor, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015-560, Brazil.
Thaís Gioda NoronhaFederal University of Pelotas, 457, Gonçalves Chaves St. 5th floor, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015-560, Brazil.
Ezequiel Caruccio RamosFederal University of Pelotas, 457, Gonçalves Chaves St. 5th floor, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015-560, Brazil.
Reginaldo Batista Dos Santos-JuniorDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Cláudio Batista St., Aracaju, 49060-108, Brazil.
Kaio Heide SampaioFederal University of Pelotas, 457, Gonçalves Chaves St. 5th floor, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015-560, Brazil.
André Luis Faria-E-SilvaDepartment of Dentistry, Federal University of Sergipe, Cláudio Batista St., Aracaju, 49060-108, Brazil.
Marcos Britto CorrêaFederal University of Pelotas, 457, Gonçalves Chaves St. 5th floor, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, 96015-560, Brazil. marcosbrittocorrea@hotmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-3541
Universidade Federal de Pelotas · BRUniversidade Federal de Sergipe · BR

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior PROCAD
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate whether patients' skin color could exert an influence on the dentist's decision-making for treatment, in four different cities in Brazil. MATERIAL AND

methodsLists of dentists were obtained and the sample selection was performed systematically. Two questionnaires were produced for the same clinical case, but the images were digitally manipulated to obtain a patient with a black and a white skin color. Dentists were free to choose treatment without any restrictions, including the financial aspects. A random sequence (white or black) was generated which was placed at random in sealed, opaque envelopes. Dentists were questioned about the decision on the treatment of a severely decayed tooth and an ill-adapted amalgam restoration.

resultsA total of 636 dentists agreed to participate in the study. After adjustments (multinomial logistic regression), it was observed that the black patient with a decayed tooth had a 50% lower risk of being referred for prosthetic treatment (p = 0.023) and a 99% higher risk of receiving a composite resin restoration, compared to the white patient (p = 0.027). No differences were observed regarding recommendation for tooth extraction (p = 0.657). In relation to an ill-adapted amalgam, the black patient had less risk of receiving a referral replacement with composite resin (0.09 95%CI [0.01-0.82]) and finishing and polishing (0.11 5%CI [0.01-0.99]) compared with the white patient.

conclusionPatient skin color influenced the dentist's choice of treatment. In general, black patients receive referrals for cheaper, simpler procedures. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Skin color played an important role in dentists' treatment decisions. Professionals may contribute unconsciously to the propagation and replication of racial discrimination.

Indexed as

Clinical Decision-MakingBrazilDental Restoration, PermanentDentistsHumansPractice Patterns, Dentists'Skin PigmentationSurveys and QuestionnairesAmalgamDecayed toothSkin colorTreatment

Identifiers

PMID29934799
OpenAlexW2811338955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.