Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934561›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neuroscience2018

Opioid receptors: drivers to addiction?

Emmanuel Darcq, Brigitte Lina Kieffer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 205 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
205citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

205 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 353 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Activation dynamics of a water-soluble human mu-opioid receptor.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

145 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emmanuel DarcqDouglas Mental Health Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Brigitte Lina KiefferDouglas Mental Health Institute, Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. brigitte.kieffer@douglas.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-8809-8334
Douglas Mental Health University Institute · CAInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drug addiction is a worldwide societal problem and public health burden, and results from recreational drug use that develops into a complex brain disorder. The opioid system, one of the first discovered neuropeptide systems in the history of neuroscience, is central to addiction. Recently, opioid receptors have been propelled back on stage by the rising opioid epidemics, revolutions in G protein-coupled receptor research and fascinating developments in basic neuroscience. This Review discusses rapidly advancing research into the role of opioid receptors in addiction, and addresses the key questions of whether we can kill pain without addiction using mu-opioid-receptor-targeting opiates, how mu- and kappa-opioid receptors operate within the neurocircuitry of addiction and whether we can bridge human and animal opioid research in the field of drug abuse.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainHumansNeuronsPainReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, muRewardSubstance-Related DisordersReceptors, Opioid, kappaReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID29934561
OpenAlexW2808792445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.