Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934420›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2018

High-Resolution Imaging of Interaction Between Thrombus and Stent-Retriever in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke.

Anouchska S A Autar, Hajo M Hund, Sharad A Ramlal, Daniël Hansen, Geert J Lycklama À Nijeholt, Bart J Emmer, Moniek P M de Maat, Diederik W J Dippel, Aad van der Lugt, Adriaan C G M van Es and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Deep learning prediction of stroke thrombus red blood cell content from multiparametric MRI.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  3. The Stream Device-A Retrospective Review of 51 Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Thrombus Structural Composition in Cardiovascular Disease.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2021
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Anouchska S A AutarDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hajo M HundDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sharad A RamlalDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Daniël HansenDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert J Lycklama À NijeholtDepartment of Radiology, Haaglanden Medisch Centrum, The Hague, the Netherlands.
Bart J EmmerDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Moniek P M de MaatDepartment of Hematology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Diederik W J DippelDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Aad van der LugtDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Adriaan C G M van EsDepartment of Radiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Heleen M M van BeusekomDepartment of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands h.vanbeusekom@erasmusmc.nl.
MR CLEAN Registry Investigators
Erasmus MC · NLBureau van Dijk (Belgium) · BEDorn Research Institute · USGF Jooste Hospital · ZAHester · INMedisch Centrum Haaglanden · NLLeman University · CHMaxim Integrated (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently, acute ischemic stroke is still a leading cause of mortality and morbidity. Approximately 2 years ago, mechanical thrombectomy was proven beneficial as a revolutionary new therapy for stroke in the MR-CLEAN trial (A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Netherlands). However, the mechanisms by which the thrombectomy device, or stent-retriever, interacts with the thrombus are largely unknown. A better understanding could lead to improved efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy devices. METHODS AND

resultsSeven stent-retrievers with thrombi still entrapped were collected directly after thrombectomy. The stent-retrievers were studied using micro computed tomography, followed by scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy. Two independent observers rated interaction type and thrombus surface structure (porous filamentous or dense) at the interaction sites.A total of 79 interaction sites between thrombus and stent-retriever were categorized. Thrombus-stent-retriever interaction was found to be adhesive (n=44; 56%) or mechanical (n=35; 44%). Adhesive interaction was most frequently observed at interaction sites with a dense surface, compared with interaction sites with a porous filamentous fibrin surface (38/58; 66% versus 6/21; 29%,

conclusionsThe interaction between thrombus and stent-retriever was predominantly adhesive, not mechanical. Adhesive interaction was strongly associated with the presence of a dense thrombus surface without a porous filamentous fibrin network.

Indexed as

Microscopy, Electron, ScanningStentsX-Ray MicrotomographyAdhesivenessBrain IschemiaHumansIntracranial ThrombosisNetherlandsPorosityProspective StudiesProsthesis DesignRegistriesStrokeSurface PropertiesThrombectomyThrombolytic Therapyischemic strokemechanical thrombectomyscanning electron microscopystent‐retrieverthrombus

Identifiers

PMID29934420
PMCPMC6064914
OpenAlexW2809407025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.