Evidence map›Paper›PMID 29934395›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2018

Satisfactory Analgesia with Minimal Emesis in Day Surgeries (SAME DayS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial of morphine versus hydromorphone.

Harsha Shanthanna, James Paul, Peter Lovrics, P J Devereaux, Mohit Bhandari, Lehana Thabane

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02223377 (Most Effective Opioid Analgesia in Ambulatory Surgeries), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02223377 nacompletednot on this map

Most Effective Opioid Analgesia in Ambulatory Surgeries: a Randomized Control, Investigator Blinded, Parallel Group With Superiority Design Study of Morphine Versus Hydromorphone

TypeinterventionalSponsorMcMaster UniversityRan2015 to 2019Enrolled402ConditionsPain, Post Operative Nausea and VomitingArmsMorphine, Hydromorphone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Harsha ShanthannaDepartment of Anesthesia, St Joseph's Health Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
James PaulDepartment of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Peter LovricsDepartment of Surgery, Joseph's Healthcare, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
P J DevereauxDepartment of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Mohit BhandariDepartment of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Lehana ThabaneDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThere has been an exponential increase in the number of ambulatory surgeries (AS). Pain and postoperative nausea vomiting (PONV) affects the recovery, discharge and overall satisfaction of patients having AS. Opioids remain the primary modality for moderate to severe pain. Since there is no perfect opioid, physicians should ideally use the opioid that optimally balances benefits and risks. Present decisions on the choice between morphine (M) and hydromorphone (HM) are based on individual experience and observation. Our primary objective is to compare the proportion of patients having AS achieving satisfactory analgesia without significant PONV when using M compared with HM. Secondarily we will compare the proportion of patients with adverse events, analgesic used, patient satisfaction, time to discharge and postdischarge symptoms. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a two-arm, multicentre, parallel group, randomised controlled trial of 400 patients having AS. Eligible patients undergoing AS of the abdominal and pelvic regions with a potential to cause moderate to severe pain will be recruited in the preoperative clinic. Using a computer-generated randomization, with a 1:1 allocation ratio, patients will be randomised to M or HM. Patients, healthcare providers and research personnel will be blinded. Study interventions will be administered in the recovery using equianalgesic doses of M or HM in concealed syringes. Patients will be followed in hospital and up to 3 months. Intention-to-treat approach will be used for analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Hamilton integrated research ethics board. We plan to publish our trial findings and present our findings at scientific meetings. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02223377; Pre-results.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodHumansHydromorphoneLogistic ModelsMorphineMulticenter Studies as TopicOntarioPain ManagementPain MeasurementPostoperative CarePostoperative Nausea and VomitingPostoperative PainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidHydromorphoneMorphineadult anaesthesiahydromorphonemorphinepain managementponvvomiting

Identifiers

PMID29934395
PMCPMC6020940
OpenAlexW2809342852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.