Observational studyBMJ open2018
Design and rationale for the Japanese Registry of Rivaroxaban Effectiveness & Safety for the Prevention of Recurrence in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism (J'xactly) study.
Observational study in BMJ open, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03091621 (Japanese Registry of Rivaroxaban Effectiveness & Safety for the Prevention of Recurrence in Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Japanese Registry of Rivaroxaban Effectiveness & Safety for the Prevention of Recurrence in Patients With Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prognostication of Patients with Pulmonary Thromboembolism with and without Residual Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Subanalysis of the J'xactly Study.Annals of vascular diseases · 2023Article
- Rivaroxaban treatment for asymptomatic venous thromboembolism: insights from the J'xactly study.Thrombosis journal · 2023Article
- Duration of Initial Intensive Rivaroxaban Therapy for Patients With Venous Thromboembolism - Subanalysis of the J'xactly Study.Circulation reports · 2023Article
- Relationship between baseline D-dimer and prognosis in Japanese patients with venous thromboembolism: Insights from the J'xactly study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2023Article
- Comparison of Effectiveness and Safety Among 3 Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients With Venous Thromboembolism - A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Circulation reports · 2022Article
- Rivaroxaban Treatment for Patients With Unprovoked or Provoked Venous Thromboembolism - Subanalysis of the J'xactly Study.Circulation reports · 2022Article
- Clinical Outcome After Discontinuation of Anticoagulation Therapy in Japanese Patients With Venous Thromboembolism - Insights From the J'xactly Study.Circulation reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor used as a direct oral anticoagulant, is beneficial over warfarin in terms of food-drug interactions and the need for therapeutic monitoring in patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE), including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Because there is little data regarding VTE treatment in Japan, a real-world survey of Japanese patients being treated with rivaroxaban for VTE is needed. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Japanese Registry of Rivaroxaban Effectiveness & Safety for the Prevention of Recurrence in Patients with Deep Vein Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism has been established to investigate the clinical outcomes of rivaroxaban for the initial treatment and prevention of symptomatic recurrent VTE in Japanese patients with acute symptomatic/asymptomatic VTE. 150 institutions in Japan will enrol patients in the study; the target enrolment is 1000. All patients will be followed up two times a year for at least 18 months and up to 3 years after their enrolment. The primary outcome is symptomatic recurrent VTE occurring during the study period. The principal safety outcome is clinically relevant bleeding (ie, major bleeding or clinically relevant non-major bleeding) occurring during treatment. A clinical events committee will adjudicate all outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, Clinical Research Ethics Committee and all local institutional ethics committees of the participating hospitals. Findings of the study will be presented in scientific sessions and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03091621,UMIN000025072; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.