ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2018
Fine details in complex environments: the power of cryo-electron tomography.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- In vitro, cellular and in vivo studies of amyloid oligomers structure and toxicity: Challenges and advances.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026Review
- Structural biology inside multicellular specimens using electron cryotomography.Quarterly reviews of biophysics · 2025Review
- The nucleocapsid architecture and structural atlas of the prototype baculovirus define the hallmarks of a new viral realm.Science advances · 2024Article
- Strategies for picking membrane-associated particles within subtomogram averaging workflows.Faraday discussions · 2022Article
- Electron microscopy for imaging organelles in plants and algae.Plant physiology · 2022Article
- Cryo-EM: A new dawn in thyroid biology.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2021Review
- Current data processing strategies for cryo-electron tomography and subtomogram averaging.The Biochemical journal · 2021Review
- Mechanisms of ligand binding.Biophysics reviews · 2020Review
- Changes in Membrane Protein Structural Biology.Biology · 2020Review
- A cryo-tomography-based volumetric model of the actin core of mouse vestibular hair cell stereocilia lacking plastin 1.Journal of structural biology · 2020Article
- Investigating eukaryotic cells with cryo-ET.Molecular biology of the cell · 2020Article
- An Ultrastructural Study of the Extruded Polar Tube of Anncaliia algerae (Microsporidia).The Journal of eukaryotic microbiology · 2020Article
- Advances in Structure Modeling Methods for Cryo-Electron Microscopy Maps.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
- In situ structure determination by subtomogram averaging.Current opinion in structural biology · 2019Review
- Coat flexibility in the secretory pathway: a role in transport of bulky cargoes.Current opinion in cell biology · 2019Review
- A collection of yeast cellular electron cryotomography data.GigaScience · 2019Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cryo-electron tomography (CET) is uniquely suited to obtain structural information from a wide range of biological scales, integrating and bridging knowledge from molecules to cells. In particular, CET can be used to visualise molecular structures in their native environment. Depending on the experiment, a varying degree of resolutions can be achieved, with the first near-atomic molecular structures becoming recently available. The power of CET has increased significantly in the last 5 years, in parallel with improvements in cryo-EM hardware and software that have also benefited single-particle reconstruction techniques. In this review, we cover the typical CET pipeline, starting from sample preparation, to data collection and processing, and highlight in particular the recent developments that support structural biology
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.